Introduction Clinical trial design impacts Level of Evidence Clinical trials may be either observational or experimental observational researchers observe patient groups without allocation of intervention may be either prospective or retrospective may be descriptive or analytic descriptive useful for obtaining background information for more advance studies examples case reports case series cross-sectional studies analytic explores the association between a given outcome and a potentially related variable examples case-control cohort meta-analysis experimental researchers allocate treatment allows the evaluation of efficacies of therapeutic interventions examples double-blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial is the gold standard for evidence based medicine Conflict of interest statement submitted with each publication for each author discloses all financial interests of each author as it relates to the study and/or publication Randomized controlled trial Definition a study in which patients are randomly assigned to the treatment or control group and are followed prospectively provides the most compelling evidence that the study treatment causes the expected effect on human health randomization minimizes study selection bias by definition an experimental study because there is an intervention Study designs parallel-group each participant is randomly assigned to a group, and all the participants in the group receive (or do not receive) an intervention, crossover administration of two or more therapies, one after the other, in a random order susceptible to bias if washout period is inadequate factorial each participant is randomly assigned to a group that receives a particular combination of interventions or non-interventions. cluster pre-existing groups of participants (e.g., villages, schools) are randomly selected to receive (or not receive) an intervention. Blinding blinding of the outcome assessor likely to decrease the treatment effect reported in the study Analysis intent-to-treat analysis outcomes based on the group into which they were randomized, regardless of whether the patient actually received the planned intervention minimizes non-responder bias as-treated analysis outcomes based on actual intervention received, regardless of which group their were randomized to. by definition, when as-treated analysis is done, the results are no longer a RCT used when there is higher cross-over from randomization groups (e.g., a patient is randomized to nonoperative treatment, but elects to obtain surgical treatment). per protocol excludes patients who were not compliant with the protocol guidelines Example you want to determine whether your new toothpaste prevents cavities better than your old toothpaste. You randomly assign a large number of patients to either an intervention group, which uses the new toothpaste, or to a control group, which uses the old toothpaste. You would then measure the amount of cavities between the groups over time. Orthopaedic Literature Examples Cohort study Definition a study in which patient groups are separated non-randomly by exposure or treatment, with exposure occurring after (prospective), or before (retrospective), the initiation of the study Evidence 217480Level II or III evidence Analysis results usually reported as relative-risk Example you want to determine if smoking is a risk factor for the development of lung cancer. You identify a group of smokers and a group of non-smokers, and follow them over time measuring the desired outcome, in this case, lung cancer. Orthopaedic Literature Examples Case-control study Definition a study in which patient groups are separated by the current presence (cases) or absence (controls) of disease and examined for the prior exposure of interest Evidence Most are Level III evidence Analysis usually reported as odds-ratio Example you want to determine if smoking is a risk factor for the development of lung cancer. You compare the smoking history of individuals with lung cancer (cases) and those without (controls). Orthopaedic Literature Examples Meta-analysis Definition a systematic review that summarizes results of other studies Evidence may be used to increase the statistical power of several under-powered studies Example you want to determine if wearing sunscreen results in fewer cases of melanoma. You pool the results of 9 randomized controlled studies and statistically analyze the data to determine the effect of the relationship. Orthopaedic Literature Examples Cross-sectional Study Definition study group is analyzed at a given time ("snapshot") with no follow-up Example you want to determine the prevalence of baseball injuries during the 2003 little-league season Orthopaedic Literature Examples Case Series Definition a retrospective account of multiple patients with the same injury or treatment with no control or comparison group useful for generating hypotheses for additional studies Evidence level IV evidence Example you have found that several of your patients who have used a new lipid lowering medication have developed hemorrhagic cysts. You want to alert other members of the community of this possible association. Orthopaedic Literature Examples
QUESTIONS 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Previous Next Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ13.195) A study was designed to measure the benefit of subacromial corticosteroid injections. Participants were randomized to methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg with lidocaine 1% or lidocaine 1% alone. The participants were not provided with information of their treatment allocation. The subacromial injection was prepared and administered by a single orthopaedic surgeon. Results were collected by the orthopaedic surgeon using clinical and patient satisfaction outcome scores at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Which of the following would best describe this type of study? QID: 4830 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Double blinded randomized and controlled study 4% (199/5064) 2 Single blinded randomized study 88% (4453/5064) 3 Retrospective study 1% (36/5064) 4 Case-control study 2% (104/5064) 5 Prospective cohort study 5% (232/5064) L 1 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 2 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (SBQ11OS.172.1) Which of the following study designs describes a randomized controlled trial in which two interventions are applied separately or in combination to study groups? QID: 214451 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Parallel 32% (513/1606) 2 Cluster 5% (81/1606) 3 Cohort 17% (277/1606) 4 Factorial 20% (314/1606) 5 Crossover 26% (416/1606) L 5 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ11.243) A clinical trial is underway for patients with wrist extensor tendinitis. One group of 100 patients are treated with short arm casting. Another group of 100 patients are treated with physical therapy. During analysis of the results, it becomes apparent that 30 patients in the physical therapy group did not complete the full course of physical therapy. Despite not completing a full course of physical therapy, these 30 patients were included in the physical therapy group for analysis. This analysis is an example of which of the following? QID: 3666 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Per-protocol 7% (453/6706) 2 Crossover analysis 6% (389/6706) 3 Intent-to-treat 79% (5302/6706) 4 Bayesian analysis 5% (309/6706) 5 Effect size 3% (199/6706) L 2 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 3 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ09.34) What is the primary purpose of utilizing a computer random number generator for patient randomization when designing a Level I therapeutic controlled trial? QID: 2847 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 To increase treatment effect 0% (4/937) 2 To prevent selection bias 97% (905/937) 3 To generate enough power 1% (5/937) 4 To achieve statistical significance 2% (15/937) 5 To perform as-treated analysis 0% (3/937) L 1 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 2 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ05.86) A clinical study for lateral epicondylitis allocates 1 group to receive physical therapy for 4 weeks and another group a new oral medication for 4 weeks. Then the 2 groups immediately switch therapies with one another for the next 4 weeks. The half-life of the medication used in the study is 2 weeks. Which of the following best describes the bias that is present in this study design? QID: 972 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Recall bias 5% (65/1429) 2 Verification bias 3% (47/1429) 3 Washout period bias 75% (1078/1429) 4 Detection bias 7% (96/1429) 5 Incorporation bias 9% (135/1429) L 2 Question Complexity A Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 3 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ04.149) A research study is initially designed as a high-quality randomized control trial. The study seeks to demonstrate a different clinical outcome with treatment A compared to treatment B for a specific disease. However, at the completion of the study the investigators are only able to obtain 70% follow-up of patients. What level of evidence should be assigned to this study? QID: 1254 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 1 19% (338/1812) 2 2 68% (1237/1812) 3 3 10% (183/1812) 4 4 2% (45/1812) 5 5 0% (4/1812) L 2 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 2 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic
All Videos (1) Podcasts (2) 2022 California Orthopaedic Association Annual Meeting Cognitive Bias in Clinical Reasoning - Lesley Anderson, MD Lesley Anderson Basic Science - Clinical Trial Design 9/7/2022 135 views 0.0 (0) Basic Science | Clinical Trial Design & Levels of Evidence (ft. Dr. Adolph Yates) Team Orthobullets 4 Basic Science - Clinical Trial Design Listen Now 6:57 min 10/18/2019 36 plays 5.0 (1) Basic Science⎪Clinical Trial Design Basic Science - Clinical Trial Design Listen Now 23:24 min 8/13/2020 139 plays 0.0 (0)