Updated: 5/12/2018

Acromio-Clavicular Injuries (AC Separation)

Topic
Review Topic
0
0
Questions
7
0
0
Evidence
12
0
0
Videos
12
Cases
1
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3047/images/Xray - AP - AC separation_moved.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3047/images/ac separation type 3_moved.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3047/images/14a_moved.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3047/images/14b_moved.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3047/images/hook plate.jpg
Introduction 
  • Definition
    • injury to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint with disruption of the AC ligaments with or without coracoclavicular (CC) ligament disruption
  • Epidemiology
    • incidence
      • common injury making up 9% of shoulder girdle injuries
    • demographics
      • more common in males and athletes
  • Pathophysiology
    • mechanism
      • direct blow to the shoulder
      • often sustained while falling onto the shoulder
Anatomy
  • Osteology 
    • diarthrodial joint
      • articulation of the scapula (medial acromion) and the lateral clavicle
      • oblique orientation of joint surface
    • contains a fibrocartilaginous intraarticular disc between the osseous elements
      • analogous to the meniscus of the knee
      • involutes with age, disintegrates by age 40
  • Motion
    • primarily gliding motion
    • rotational motion is minimal 
      • clavicle rotates 40-50° posteriorly with shoulder elevation
      • only ~8° rotation through the AC joint, due to synchronous scapuloclavicular motion
  • Stability
    • static
      • joint capsule
      • acromioclavicular (AC) ligaments
        • controls horizontal motion and anterior-posterior stability
        • has superior, inferior, anterior and posterior components
          • posterior and superior AC ligaments are most important for stability
      • coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments
        • controls vertical motion and superior-inferior stability
        • two ligaments
          • conoid
            • medial
            • inserts on clavicle 4.5cm medial to lateral edge
            • most important for vertical stability
          • trapezoid
            • lateral
            • inserts on clavicle 3cm medial to lateral edge
    • dynamic
      • anterior deltoid
      • trapezius
Presentation
  • Symptoms
    • pain
      • usually over AC joint
      • can also be referred to the trapezius
  • Physical exam
    • lateral clavicle or AC joint tenderness
    • abnormal contour of the shoulder compared to contralateral side
    • stability assessment
      • horizontal (anterior-posterior) stability evaluates AC ligaments
        • cross-body adduction
        • horizontal instability (ISAKOS type 3B) may indicate need for more aggressive treatment
      • vertical (superior-inferior) stability evaluates CC ligaments 
Imaging
  • Radiographs
    • required views
      • bilateral anteroposterior (AP) view of AC joints
        • compare displacement to contralateral side
          • measured as distance from top of coracoid to bottom of clavicle
        • use 1/3 penetration on AP to visualize AC joint
      • axillary lateral view 
        • required to diagnose Type IV (posterior)
      • zanca view 
        • performed by tilting the x-ray beam 10-15° cephalad and using only 50% of the standard shoulder AP penetrance q
    • additional veiws
      • cross-body adduction view (Basmania)
        • scapular Y performed with cross-body adduction stress
      • weighted stress views 
        • usually no longer used
        • may help differentiate Type II from Type III
    • findings
      • fractures can mimic AC separations
        • base of coracoid fracture
        • Neer type 2A distal clavicle fracture
          • ligaments remain attached to distal fragment as proximal (medial) fragment displaces
Classification

Rockwood Classification
Type
AC ligament
CC ligament
Exam
Radiographs
Reducibility  Treatment
Illus.
Xray
Type I
sprain
normal
AC tenderness; no AC instability 
normal
  sling
 
Type II
torn
sprain
AC horizontal instability
AC joint disrupted; increased CC distance < 25% of contralateral
reducible
sling
 
Type III
torn
torn

increased CC distance 25-100% of contralateral
reducible controversial
IIIA     AC vertical instability, no horizontal  stability
       
IIIB     AC vertical + horizontal instability
       
Type IV
torn
torn
skin tenting, posterior fullness
lateral clavicle displaced posterior through trapezius on the axillary lateral XR
not reducible surgery
 
Type V
torn
torn
severe shoulder droop, does not improve with shrug
increased CC distance > 100% of contralateral
not reducible surgery
Type VI
torn
torn
rare; associated injuries; paresthesias
inferior dislocation of lateral clavicle, lying either in subacromial or subcoracoid position
not reducible surgery
 


Differential Diagnosis
  • Coracoid fracture
    • base of coracoid fracture can mimic a CC ligament disruption
    • has superiorly displaced distal clavicle, but normal CC distance (normal is 11-13mm) 
  • Distal clavicle fracture (Neer 2A)
    • can mimic AC separations as well, as ligaments remain attached to distal component
Treatment
  • Nonoperative
    • brief sling immobilization, rest, ice, physical therapy 
      • indications
        • type I and II 
        • type III in most individuals
          • good results when clavicle displaced < 2cm
      • rehab
        • early shoulder range of motion
        • regain functional motion by 6 weeks
        • return to normal activity at 12 weeks
        • consider corticosteroid injections
      • outcomes
        • type III treated non-op had higher DASH scores at 6 weeks and 3 months, and equal function at 1 year with lower rate of secondary surgery (removal of hardware) compared to those treated operatively
      • complications
        • AC joint arthritis
        • chronic subluxation and instability
  • Operative
    • CC interval restoration (ORIF vs. Ligament Reconstruction)
      • indications
        • acute type IV, V or VI injuries
        • acute type III injuries in laborers, elite athletes, patients with cosmetic concerns
        • chronic type III injuries that failed non-op treatment
          • historically it was thought acute injuries were treated with ORIF and chronic injuries were treated with CC ligment reconstruction
            • however, new studies have shown no difference in outcomes in types III injuries treated surgically with ORIF after 6 weeks non-op treatment versus immediate surgery
      • contraindications
        • patient unlikely to comply with postoperative rehabilitation
        • skin problems over fixation approach site
      • techniques
        • ligament reconstruction with soft tissue graft
          • Modified Weaver-Dunn
            • distal clavicle excision with transfer of coracoacromial ligament to the distal clavicle to recreate CC ligament
          • autograft
          • allograft
        • fixation
          • suture
          • hook plate
          • CC screw (Bosworth)
          • cortical flip button (e.g Dog Bone)(+/- arthroscopic assistance)
          • K-wire 
      • rehabilitation
        • sling immobilization for 6 weeks, no shoulder range of motion
        • return to full activity after 6 months 
Techniques
  • ORIF with CC screw fixation (Bosworth screw)  
    • has fallen out of favor 
    • approach 
      • proximal aspect of anterolateral approach to the shoulder 
    • technique
      • screw placement from distal clavicle to coracoid, superior to inferior
    • pros
      • rigid internal fixation
    • cons
      • danger of screw being too long and damage to critical structure below coracoid
      • routine screw removal at 8-12 weeks is advised to prevent screw breakage 
        • due to normal motion between clavicle and scapula
    • complications
      • hardware irritation at level of screw purchase in coracoid
      • hardware failure at level of screw purchase in coracoid
  • ORIF with CC suture fixation
    • approach
      • proximal aspect of anterolateral approach to the shoulder
    • technique
      • suture placed either around or through clavicle and around the base of the coracoid
      • can also use suture anchors for coracoid fixation
    • pros
      • no risk of hardware failure or migration
    • cons
      • suture not as strong as screw fixation
      • requires careful suture passage inferior to coracoid due to proximity of crucial neurovascular structures
    • complications
      • suture erosion causing distal third clavicle fracture
      • hardware irritation  
  • ORIF with AC pin fixation (Phemister Technique)
    • approach
      • can be done percutaneously
    • technique
      • smooth wire or pin fixation directly across AC joint
    • cons
      • hardware irritation
    • complications
      • high incidence of pin migration 
      • generally not performed due to high complication rates
  • ORIF with AC hook plate fixation 
    • approach
      • exposure of distal and middle clavicle
    • technique
      • use of standard hook plate over superior distal clavicle
    • pros
      • rigid fixation
    • cons
      • requires second surgery for plate removal
    • complications
      • acromial erosion
      • hook pullout
  • CC ligament reconstruction with coracoacromial (CA) ligament (Modified Weaver-Dunn)
    • approach
      • proximal aspect of anterolateral approach to the shoulder
      • arthroscopic technique also described  
    • technique
      • distal clavicle excision 
      • transfer of coracoacromial ligament to the distal clavicle to recreate CC ligament
      • reinforce with internal fixation
    • cons
      • coracoacromial ligament only 20% as strong as normal CC ligament
      • lack of internal fixation risks failure of soft tissue repair
  • CC ligament reconstruction with free tendon graft  
    • approach
      • proximal aspect of anterolateral approach to the shoulder
      • can be performed arthroscopically-assisted
    • graft
      • autograft
        • palmaris longus
        • semitendinosus
      • allograft
        • tibialis anterior
    • technique
      • figure-of-eight passage of graft, looping around coracoid and fixation through clavicular tunnels
      • reinforce with internal fixation
    • pros
      •  graft reconstruction more closely recreates strength of native CC ligament
    • cons
      • standard risks of allograft use or autograft harvest
      • lack of internal fixation risks failure of soft tissue repair
Complications
  • Residual pain at AC joint
    •  30-50%
  • AC arthritis 
    • more common with surgical management than with nonoperative treatment
  • Hardware failure
    • CC screw breakage/pullout
  • Coracoid fracture
    • can occur with coracoid tunnel drilling
 

Please rate topic.

Average 4.4 of 47 Ratings

Thank you for rating! Please vote below and help us build the most advanced adaptive learning platform in medicine

The complexity of this topic is appropriate for?
How important is this topic for board examinations?
How important is this topic for clinical practice?
Questions (7)
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK

(OBQ09.272) A 58-year-old right-hand dominant accountant falls off a bicycle 4 days ago and injured his left non-dominant shoulder. A radiograph is shown in Figure A. The axillary radiograph shows no antero-posterior translation. What is the most appropriate next step in treatment? Review Topic

QID: 3085
FIGURES:
1

Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

1%

(32/2543)

2

Acromioclavicular capsular reconstruction

1%

(19/2543)

3

Sling and early ROM exercises

97%

(2460/2543)

4

Arthroscopic distal clavicle excision

0%

(8/2543)

5

Weaver-Dunn procedure

1%

(16/2543)

ML 1

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

PREFERRED RESPONSE 3
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK

(OBQ08.7) For Grade III AC joint separations, surgical treatment results in which of the following when compared to non-operative management? Review Topic

QID: 393
1

Faster return to play

16%

(280/1711)

2

Increased range of motion

3%

(52/1711)

3

Increased functional rotator cuff strength

4%

(73/1711)

4

Decreased funtional rotator cuff strength

0%

(4/1711)

5

Higher complication rate

76%

(1295/1711)

ML 2

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

PREFERRED RESPONSE 5

(OBQ08.203) A football player sustains a suspected shoulder separation. In addition to a true AP and an axillary lateral, which of the following additional radiographic views is most appropriate to evaluate the AC joint? Review Topic

QID: 589
1

Stryker notch view

5%

(61/1143)

2

West Point view

7%

(83/1143)

3

Supraspinatus outlet view

4%

(45/1143)

4

Velpeau view

5%

(54/1143)

5

Zanca view

78%

(897/1143)

ML 2

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

PREFERRED RESPONSE 5

(SAE07SM.86) A 46-year-old woman fell from her bicycle and sustained the injury shown in Figure 24. Which of the following ligaments has been disrupted? Review Topic

QID: 8748
FIGURES:
1

Acromioclavicular

1%

(8/630)

2

Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular

96%

(602/630)

3

Coracoclavicular

3%

(17/630)

4

Coracoacromial and sternoclavicular

0%

(2/630)

5

Sternoclavicular

0%

(0/630)

ML 1

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

PREFERRED RESPONSE 2

(OBQ05.251) What is the preferred treatment for a symptomatic acute acromioclavicular separation where there is a 20% increase in the coracoclavicular distance on AP radiograph compared to the opposite uninjured side? Review Topic

QID: 1137
1

Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

3%

(45/1573)

2

Acute repair of acromioclavicular capsule

0%

(6/1573)

3

Sling followed by early physical therapy

95%

(1487/1573)

4

Reduction and retrograde pinning of the acromioclavicular joint

1%

(19/1573)

5

Distal clavicle excision

0%

(5/1573)

ML 1

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

PREFERRED RESPONSE 3
ARTICLES (32)
VIDEOS (12)
CASES (1)
Topic COMMENTS (28)
Private Note