Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Updated: Oct 1 2023

THA Periprosthetic Fracture

Images
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/5013/images/b3.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/5013/images/vancouver b3.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/5013/images/vancouver a radiograph.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/5013/images/b1.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/5013/images/vancouver b2 radiograph.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/5013/images/vancouver c radiograph.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/5013/images/vancouver b3.jpg
  • summary
    • THA Periprosthetic Fractures are a complication of a total hip prosthesis with increasing incidence as a result of increased arthroplasty procedures and high-demands of elderly patients.
    • Diagnosis can be made with plain radiographs of the affected hip and ipsilateral femur.
    • Treatment may be nonoperative or operative based on location of fracture, implant stability and bone stock available. 
  • Epidemiology
    • Incidence
      • intraoperative fractures
        • 3.5% of primary uncemented hip replacements
        • 0.4% of cemented arthroplasties
      • postoperative fractures
        • 0.1%
        • most common at stem tip
  • Etiology
    • Classification
      • intraoperative fractures
        • femur
        • acetabulum
      • postoperative fractures
        • femur
        • acetabulum
    • Prevention
      • preoperative templating reduces risk of intraoperative fractures
      • adequate surgical exposure
      • special care when using cementless prosthesis in poor bone (RA, osteoporosis)
  • Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures
    • Introduction
      • incidence
        • cemented acetabular components
          • 0.2%
        • cementless acetabular components
          • 0.4%
      • mechanism
        • typically occurs during acetabular component impaction
      • risk factors
        • underreaming >2mm
        • elliptical modular cups
        • osteoporosis
        • cementless acetabular components
        • dysplasia
        • radiation
    • Evaluation
      • must determine stability of implant
    • Treatment
      • observation alone
        • indications
          • if evaluated intraoperatively and found to be stable
        • postoperative care
          • consider protected weight-bearing for 8-12 weeks
      • acetabular revision with screws vs. ORIF
        • indications
          • if evaluated intraoperatively and found to be unstable
        • technique
          • addition of acetabular screws
          • may consider upgrading to "jumbo" cup
          • ORIF of acetabular fracture with revision of acetabular component
            • if posterior column is compromised, ORIF + revision is most stable construct
          • may add bone graft from reamings if patient has poor bone stock
        • postoperative care
          • consider protected weight-bearing for 8-12 weeks
  • Intraoperative Femur Fractures
    • Introduction
      • incidence
        • primary THA
          • 0.1-5%
        • revision THA
          • 3-21%
      • mechanism
        • proximal fractures
          • usually occur with bone preparation (ie aggressive rasping) and prosthetic insertion
          • may occur during implant insertion from dimension mismatch
        • middle-region fractures
          • usually occur when excessive force is used during surgical exposure or bone preparation
        • distal fractures
          • usually occur when tip of a straight-stem prosthesis impacting at femoral bow
      • risk factors
        • impaction bone grafting
        • female gender
        • technical errors
        • cementless implants
        • osteoporosis
        • revision
        • minimally invasive techniques (controversial)
    • Presentation
      • change in resistance while inserting stem should raise suspicion for fracture
    • Classification
      • Vancouver classification (intraoperative)
        • considerations
          • location
          • pattern
          • stability of fracture
        • types
          • A - proximal metaphysis
          • B - diaphyseal
          • C - distal to stem tip (not amenable to insertion of longest revision stem)
        • subtypes
          • 1 - cortical perforation
          • 2 - nondisplaced crack
          • 3 - displaced unstable fracture pattern
    • Imaging
      • intraoperative radiographs are required when there is a concern for fracture
    • Treatment
      • stem removal, cabling, and reinsertion
      • trochanteric fixation with wires, cables, or claw-plate
        • indications
          • intraoperative, proximal femur fractures
      • removal of implant, insertion of longer stem prosthesis
        • indications
          • complete (two-part) fractures of middle region
        • technique
          • distal tip of stem must bypass distal extent of fracture by 2 cortical diameters
          • may use cortical allograft struts for added stability
      • removal of implant, internal fixation with plate, reinsertion of prosthesis
        • indications
          • distal fractures that cannot be bypassed with a long-stemmed prosthesis
      • Vancouver Classification & Treatment - Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fracture
      • Type
      • Description 
      • Treatment
      • A1
      • Proximal metaphysis, cortical perforation
      • Bone graft alone (e.g. from acetabular reaming)
      • A2
      • Proximal metaphysis, nondisplaced crack
      • Cerclage wire before inserting stem (to prevent crack propagation)
      •  Ignore the fracture if fully porous coated stem is used (provided there is no distal propagation)
      • A3
      • Proximal metaphysis, displaced unstable fracture
      • Fully porous coated stem, or tapered fluted stem
      • Wires/cables/claw plate for isolated GT fractures
      • B1
      • Diaphyseal, cortical perforation (usually during cement removal)
      •  Fully porous coated stem (bypass by 2 cortical diameters) ± strut allograft
      • Diaphyseal, nondisplaced crack (from increased hoop stress during broaching or implant placement)
      • Cerclage wire (if implant stable)
      • Fully porous coated stem to bypass defect (if implant unstable) ± strut allograft
      •  PWB and observation (if detected postop)
      • B3
      • Diaphyseal, displaced unstable fracture (usually during hip dislocation, cement removal, stem insertion)
      • Fully porous coated stem to bypass defect ± strut allograft
      • C1
      • Distal to stem tip, cortical perforation (during cement removal)
      • Morcellized bone graft, fully porous coated stem to bypass defect, strut allograft
      • C2
      • Distal to stem tip, nondisplaced fracture
      • Cerclage wire, strut allograft
      • C3
      • Distal to stem tip, displaced unstable fracture
      • ORIF 
  • Postoperative Femur fracture
    • Introduction
      • incidence
        • 0.1-3% for primary cementless total hip arthroplasties
      • etiology
        • early postoperative fractures
          • cementless prosthesis tend to fracture in the first six months
          • likely caused by stress risers during reaming and broaching
          • wedge-fit tapered designs cause proximal fractures
          • cylindrical fully porous-coated stems tend to cause a distal split in the femoral shaft
        • late postoperative fractures
          • cemented prosthesis tend to fracture later (5 years out)
          • tend to fracture around the tip of the prosthesis or distal to it
      • risk factors
        • poor bone quality
        • cementless prostheses
        • compromised bone stock
        • revision procedures
    • Classification
      • Vancouver classification (postoperative)
        • considerations
          • stability of prosthesis
          • location of fracture
          • quality of surrounding bone
        • pros
          • simple
          • validated
        • cons
          • often difficult to differentiate between B1 and B2 fractures based on radiographs alone
      • Vancouver Classification & Treatment - Postoperative Periprosthetic Fracture
      • Type
      • Description
      • Treatment
      • AG
      •  Fracture in greater trochanteric region.
      •  Commonly associated with osteolysis.
      •  AG (greater trochanter) fractures caused by retraction, broaching, actual implant insertion, previous hip screws.
      •  Often requires treatment that addresses the osteolysis.
      •  AG fractures with < 2cm displacement, treat nonoperatively with partial WB and allow fibrous union.
      •  AG fractures >2cm needs ORIF (loss of abductor function leads to instability) with trochanteric claw/cables
      • AL
      •  Fracture in lesser trochanteric region.
      • AL fractures are commonly treated non-operatively
      • B1
      •  Fracture around stem or just below it, with a well fixed stem
      •  ORIF using cerclage cables and locking plates
      • B2
      •  Fracture around stem or just below it, with a loose stem but good proximal bone stock 
      •  Revision of the femoral component to a long porous-coated cementless stems and fixation of the fracture fragment. 
      •  Revision of the acetabular component if indicated
      • B3
      •  Fracture around stem or just below it, with proximal bone that is poor quality or severely comminuted 
      •  Femoral component revision with proximal femoral allograft (APC) or proximal femoral replacement (PFR) 
      • C
      •  Fracture occurs well below the prosthesis
      •  
      •  ORIF with plate (leave the hip and acetabular prosthesis alone)
      •  
    • Presentation
      • often result after low-energy trauma
    • Treatment
      • nonoperative treatment with protected weight-bearing
        • indications
          • non-displaced periprosthetic fractures of greater trochanter
          • non-displaced fractures of lesser trochanter
        • technique
          • limiting abduction may decrease chances of displacement with greater trochanter fractures
      • ORIF greater trochanter with wires, cables, or claw-plate
        • indications
          • displaced periprosthetic fractures of the greater trochanter
        • technique
          • if osteolysis is present, use cancellous allograft to fill defects
      • ORIF femoral shaft with locking plate and cerclage wires
        • indications
        • technique
          • typically place cerclage wires/cables proximally and bicortical screws distal to stem
          • may use unicortical locking screws proximally
          • may add cortical strut allografts
      • femoral component revision with long-stem prosthesis
      • femoral component revision with proximal femoral allograft
        • indications
          • Vancouver B3 fractures in young patients
      • femoral component revision with proximal femoral replacement
        • indications
          • Vancouver B3 fractures in elderly, low-demand patients
Card
1 of 6
Question
1 of 59
Private Note

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options