Summary Scaphoid Fractures are the most common carpal bone fracture, often occurring after a fall onto an outstretched hand. Diagnosis can generally be made by dedicated radiographs but CT or MRI may be needed for confirmation. Treatment may require a prolonged period of cast immobilization, percutaneous surgical fixation, or open reduction and internal fixation. Epidemiology Incidence 15% of acute wrist injuries 60% of all carpal fracture 8 per 100,000 females, 38 per 100,000 males Demographics 2 :1 male : female most common in third decade of life Anatomic location percentage of fractures by scaphoid anatomic location waist -65% proximal third - 25% distal third - 10% Historically the distal pole is most common location in pediatrics due to ossification sequence, however more recently waist fractures have become most common Etiology Pathophysiology pathoanatomy most common mechanism of injury is axial load across a hyper-dorsiflexed, pronated and ulnarly-deviated wrist common in contact sports transverse fracture patterns are considered more stable than vertically or obliquely oriented fractures Associated conditions SNAC (Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse) Anatomy Osteology complex 3-dimensional structure described as resembling a boat, skiff, and twisted peanut oriented obliquely from extremity's long-axis (implications for advanced imaging techniques) largest bone in proximal carpal row > 75% of scaphoid bone is covered by articular cartilage articulates with radius, lunate, trapezium, trapezoid, and capitate Blood supply major blood supply is dorsal carpal branch (branch of the radial artery) enters scaphoid in a nonarticular ridge on the dorsal surface and supplies proximal 80% of scaphoid via retrograde blood flow minor blood supply from superficial palmar arch (branch of volar radial artery) enters distal tubercle and supplies distal 20% of scaphoid creates vascular watershed and poor fracture healing environment Biomechanics link between proximal and distal carpal row both intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments attach and surround the scaphoid the scaphoid flexes with wrist flexion and radial deviation and extends during wrist extension and ulnar deviation (same as proximal row) See Wrist Ligaments and Biomechanics for more detail Classification Herbert and Fisher Classification (based on fracture stability) Type A Stable, acute fractures Type B Unstable, acute fractures (distal oblique, complete waist, proximal pole, trans-scaphoid and perilunate associated fractures) Type C Delayed union characterized by cyst formation and fracture widening Type D Nonunion Mayo classification (based on location of fracture line) Type I Distal tubercle fracture Type II Distal articular surface fracture Type III Distal third fracture Type IV Middle third fracture Type V Proximal third fracture Russe Classification (based on fracture pattern) Type I Horizontal oblique fracture line Type II Transverse fracture line Type III Vertical oblique fracture line Presentation History high or low energy fall onto outstretched hand Symptoms variable level of pain over wrist Physical exam inspection wrist swelling rarely any ecchymosis, hematoma, or gross deformity motion worsened wrist pain with circumduction pain with resisted pronation provocative tests anatomic snuffbox tenderness dorsally scaphoid tubercle tenderness volarly scaphoid compression test positive test when pain reproduced with axial load applied through thumb metacarpal 87-100% sensitivity and 74% specificity when all three tests positive within 24 hours of injury Imaging Radiographs recommended views neutral rotation PA lateral semi-pronated (45°) oblique scaphoid 30 degree wrist extension, 20 degree ulnar deviation waist fractures seen best findings if radiographs are negative (27%) and there is a high clinical suspicion repeat radiographs in 14-21 days Bone scan indications occult fractures in acute setting sensitivity and specificity specificity of 98%, and sensitivity of 100%, PPV 85% to 93% when done at 72 hours MRI indications most sensitive for diagnosis occult fractures < 24 hours immediate identification of fractures / ligamentous injuries assessment of vascular status of bone (vascularity of proximal pole) proximal pole AVN best determined on T1 sequences sensitivity and specificity approach 100% for occult fractures CT scan with 1mm cuts along scaphoid axis indications best modality to evaluate fracture location, angulation, displacement, fragment size, extent of collapse, and progression of nonunion or union after surgery sensitivity and specificity 62% sensitivity and 87% specific for determining stability and fracture less effective than bone scan and MRI to diagnose occult fracture Treatment Nonoperative cast immobilization indications stable nondisplaced fracture (majority of fractures) if patient has normal radiographs but there is a high level of suspicion can immobilize in thumb spica and reevaluate in 12 to 21 days outcomes scaphoid fractures with <1mm displacement have union rate of 90% Operative percutaneous screw fixation indications unstable fractures as shown by proximal pole fractures displacement > 1 mm without significant angulation or deformity non-displaced waist fractures to allow decreased time to union, faster return to work/sport, similar total costs compared to casting outcomes union rates of 90-95% with operative treatment of scaphoid fractures CT scan is helpful for evaluation of union open reduction internal fixation indications significantly displaced fracture patterns 15° scaphoid humpback deformity radiolunate angle > 15° (DISI) intrascaphoid angle of > 35° scaphoid fractures associated with perilunate dislocation comminuted fractures unstable vertical or oblique fractures outcomes accuracy of reduction correlated with rate of union Technique Cast immobilization technique start immobilization early nonunion rates increase with delayed immobilization of > 4 weeks after injury long arm spica vs short arm casting is controversial no consensus duration of casting depends on location of fracture and risk of nonunion immobilization maintained until radiographic fracture healing demonstrated, usually no sooner than 8 weeks may be required for up to 12-14 weeks for high-risk fracture patterns/patients athletes should not return to play until imaging shows a healed fracture may opt to augment with pulsed electromagnetic field (studies show beneficial in delayed union) formal therapy following immobilization to regain range of motion Percutaneous screw fixation approach dorsal approach best for proximal pole fractures care must be taken to avoid EPL tendon and to preserve the blood supply when entering the dorsal ridge limit exposure to the proximal half of the scaphoid percutaneous has higher risk of unrecognized screw penetration of subchondral bone volar approach indicated in waist and distal pole fractures fractures with humpback flexion deformities allows exposure of the entire scaphoid avoids jeopardizing scaphoid blood supply uses the interval between the FCR and the radial artery careful capsule management to allow closure and restoration of RSC ligament arthroscopic assisted approach has also been described to aid in anatomic reduction technique precise wire placement in central axis to guide cannulated screw do not violate scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal joint cartilage rigidity is optimized by long screw placed down the central axis of the scaphoid oblique fluoroscopic images to confirm placement and appropriate screw length Open reduction internal fixation approach dorsal and volar approaches as above technique allows direct visualization and reduction at fracture site screw placement as above Complications Scaphoid Nonunion incidence 5-10% following immobilization, higher rates for proximal pole fractures risk factors vertical oblique fracture pattern, displacement >1mm, advancing age, nicotine use treatment vascularized or nonvascularid bone grafting procedures Osteonecrosis incidence 13-50% of all scaphoid fractures many studies showing 100% in proximal fifth fractures with immobilization Malunion flexion of distal fragment and extension of proximal fragment due to pull of scapholunate interosseous ligament creating shortened bone with humpback deformity treatment no clear indications supporting operative versus non-operative treatment Subchondral bone penetration with arthrosis due to prominent hardware incidence seen following mini-open fixation techniques incidence has decreased with use of fluoroscopy treatment revision surgical fixation versus implant removal following union SNAC wrist (scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse) Prognosis Incidence of AVN (without treatment) is directly correlated with proximity of fracture to proximal pole proximal 5th AVN rate of 100% proximal 3rd AVN rate of 33%
QUESTIONS 1 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Previous Next (SBQ17SE.4) A 25-year-old soldier fell during combat training and sustained the injury seen in Figure A. Operative and non-operative management were discussed with the patient who elected for non-operative treatment. Which of the following should be immobilized for optimal management of the injury? QID: 211149 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Thumb, wrist, and elbow 5% (87/1766) 2 Wrist and elbow 1% (16/1766) 3 Thumb and wrist 60% (1065/1766) 4 Wrist 32% (559/1766) 5 Immobilization is not necessary 1% (17/1766) L 5 Question Complexity A Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (SBQ17SE.17) A 19-year-old military service-member visits your office and complains of significant wrist pain. He was able to pass basic training but had considerable discomfort with pushups. When he was a senior in highschool he hurt his wrist playing football. He underwent surgery in his hometown but never felt like he got back to his pre-injury level of function. Radiographs are provided in Figures A and B. What modification of surgical technique may have better served this fracture pattern on the index procedure? QID: 211292 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Achieving a more center-center screw position 60% (1023/1702) 2 Using a dorsal approach with an anterograde screw 30% (517/1702) 3 Using a non-cannulated screw 1% (15/1702) 4 Using a vascularized bone transfer 7% (118/1702) 5 Using a percutaneous approach 1% (21/1702) L 3 Question Complexity A Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 1 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ09.36) A 22-year-old male snowboarder falls on an outstretched hand and presents with the radiograph shown in Figure A. Which of the following techniques is MOST important in optimizing biomechanical fixation? QID: 2849 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Using a screw placed in the central axis of the scaphoid into the subchondral bone 72% (2818/3937) 2 Using a supplementary K-wire transfixing the distal pole of the scaphoid to the capitate 11% (433/3937) 3 Using a screw placed in the dorsal axis of the scaphoid into the subchondral bone 4% (168/3937) 4 Using a larger diameter screw placed in the dorsal axis of the scaphoid 8% (334/3937) 5 Using a larger diameter screw placed in the volar axis of the scaphoid 4% (158/3937) L 3 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 1 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ09.234) Which of the following statements is TRUE about force transmission based on wrist position? QID: 3047 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 neutral wrist position decreases force through the lunate fossa 4% (162/3646) 2 extended wrist position increases force through the lunate fossa 26% (932/3646) 3 neutral wrist position increases force through the scaphoid fossa 4% (137/3646) 4 extended wrist position increases force through the scaphoid fossa 62% (2261/3646) 5 wrist position has no effect on force transmission 3% (126/3646) L 1 Question Complexity D Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ09.56) An open dorsal approach for antegrade screw fixation of a nondisplaced scaphoid waist fracture differs in which of the following ways compared to a percutaneous dorsal approach? QID: 2869 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Decreased risk of proximal pole AVN 7% (260/3967) 2 Increased risk of posterior interosseous nerve injury 4% (167/3967) 3 Decreased risk of injury to the APL tendon 12% (481/3967) 4 Increased risk of injury to the EPL tendon 7% (278/3967) 5 Decreased risk of screw prominence above subchondral bone 69% (2756/3967) L 3 Question Complexity D Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 5 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ08.111) Percutaneous screw fixation for non-displaced scaphoid waist fractures has been shown to have which of the following differences compared to closed treatment? QID: 497 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Increased direct and indirect cost 11% (385/3593) 2 Slower return to work 1% (39/3593) 3 Higher union rates 24% (864/3593) 4 Reduced time to fracture union 62% (2216/3593) 5 Improved motion and grip strength after 2 years 2% (60/3593) L 3 Question Complexity D Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ06.16) A 27-year-old professional cowboy is thrown from a bull during the rodeo and lands on his hand. No deformity is identified and the hand is completely neurovascularly intact. Pain is present upon palpation of the anatomic snuffbox. A radiograph is provided in Figure A. The cowboy wants to return to competitive riding tomorrow. Which of the following is the best next step in management? QID: 27 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Cock-up wrist splint and immediate return to sport as tolerated by pain 4% (111/3056) 2 Steroid injection of the snuffbox, taping of the wrist and return to sport 1% (30/3056) 3 Wrist MRI 86% (2614/3056) 4 Percutaneous screw fixation of the nondisplaced fracture 8% (255/3056) 5 Scapholunate ligament repair and percutaneous pin fixation 1% (20/3056) L 1 Question Complexity D Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 3 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ05.130) A 35-year-old woman reports wrist pain after a fall onto an outstretched hand. On exam, she has focal tenderness over the wrist snuffbox. A radiograph and CT image are shown in Figures A and B. What is the proper treatment of her injury? QID: 1016 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Rest, ice, elevation 0% (9/2890) 2 Removable splint for comfort 0% (7/2890) 3 Thumb spica cast 4% (121/2890) 4 Open reduction, internal fixation 94% (2728/2890) 5 Vascularized bone grafting 0% (10/2890) L 1 Question Complexity D Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic
All Videos (4) Podcasts (1) Login to View Community Videos Login to View Community Videos Cleveland Combined Hand Fellowship Lecture Series 2021-2022 Scaphoid Fractures - Anas Minkara, MD Anas Minkara Hand - Scaphoid Fracture C 12/28/2021 282 views 4.0 (1) Login to View Community Videos Login to View Community Videos Cleveland Combined Hand Fellowship Lecture Series 2020-2021 Scaphoid Fractures - Joanne Wang , MD Joanne H. Wang Hand - Scaphoid Fracture C 10/6/2020 228 views 3.0 (1) 2018 Orthopaedic Summit Evolving Techniques Screw that Scaphoid - Brian D. Adams, MD (OSET 2018) Brian D. Adams Hand - Scaphoid Fracture A 8/21/2019 4012 views 4.5 (8) Hand⎪Scaphoid Fractures Hand - Scaphoid Fracture Listen Now 21:54 min 10/15/2019 1223 plays 4.8 (5) See More See Less
Proximal Pole Scaphoid Fracture (C101536) David Johnson Hand - Scaphoid Fracture B 7/20/2020 489 14 0 Proximal Pole Scaphoid Fracture in 21M (C101517) Peter J. Evans Hand - Scaphoid Fracture B 7/6/2020 351 11 1 Acute Scaphoid Fracture in 26M (C101514) Peter J. Evans Hand - Scaphoid Fracture B 7/4/2020 9951 23 15 See More See Less