Summary A Lisfranc injury is a tarsometatarsal fracture dislocation characterized by traumatic disruption between the articulation of the medial cuneiform and base of the second metatarsal. Diagnosis is confirmed by radiographs which may show widening of the interval between the 1st and 2nd ray. Treatment is generally operative with either ORIF or arthrodesis. Epidemiology Incidence account for 0.2% of all fractures Demographics males > females more common in the third decade ETIOLOGY Pathophysiology mechanism of injury MVAs, falls from height, and athletic injuries injury cascade mechanism is usually caused by indirect rotational forces and axial load through hyper-plantarflexed forefoot hyperflexion/compression/abduction moment exerted on forefoot and transmitted to the TMT articulation metatarsals displaced in dorsal/lateral direction pathoanatomy unifying factor is disruption of the TMT joint complex injuries can range from mild sprains to severe dislocations may take form of purely ligamentous injuries or fracture-dislocations ligamentous vs. bony injury pattern has treatment implications Associated conditions tarsal fractures proximal metatarsal fractures Lisfranc equivalent injuries can present in the form of contiguous proximal metatarsal fractures or tarsal fractures can involve multiple TMT joints Anatomy Osteology Lisfranc joint complex consists of three articulations including tarsometatarsal articulation intermetatarsal articulation intertarsal or intercuneiform articulations columns of the midfoot medial column includes first tarsometatarsal joint middle column includes second and third tarsometatarsal joints lateral column includes fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joints (most mobile) Ligaments Lisfranc ligament an interosseous ligament that goes from medial cuneiform to base of 2nd metatarsal on plantar surface critical to stabilizing the 1st and 2nd tarsometatarsal joints and maintenance of the midfoot arch Lisfranc ligament tightens with pronation and abduction of forefoot plantar tarsometatarsal ligaments injury of the plantar ligament between the medial cuneiform and the second and third metatarsals along with the Lisfranc ligament is necessary to give transverse instability. dorsal tarsometatarsal ligaments dorsal ligaments are weaker and therefore bony displacement with injury is often dorsal intermetatarsal ligaments between second-fifth metatarsal bases no direct ligamentous attachment between first and second metatarsal Biomechanics Lisfranc joint complex is inherently stable with little motion due to stable osseous architecture second metatarsal fits in mortise created by medial cuneiform and recessed middle cuneiform, "keystone configuration" ligamentous restraints see individual ligaments above Classification Hardcastle & Myerson Classification Type A Complete homolateral dislocation Type B1 Partial injury, medial column dislocation Type B2 Partial injury, lateral column dislocation Type C1 Partial injury, divergent dislocation Type C2 Complete injury, divergent dislocation Presentation History history of high energy trauma or sporting accident Symptoms severe midfoot pain inability to bear weight Physical exam inspection & palpation medial plantar ecchymosis swelling throughout midfoot tenderness over tarsometatarsal joint motion instability test grasp metatarsal heads and apply dorsal force to forefoot while other hand palpates the TMT joints dorsal subluxation suggests instability if first and second metatarsals can be displaced medially and laterally, global instability is present and surgery is required when plantar ligaments are intact, dorsal subluxation does not occur with stress exam and injury may be treated nonoperatively provocative tests may reproduce pain with pronation and abduction of forefoot Imaging Radiographs recommended views AP lateral oblique weight-bearing with comparison view may be necessary to confirm diagnosis findings five critical radiographic signs that indicate presence of midfoot instability discontinuity of a line drawn from the medial base of the 2nd metatarsal to the medial side of the middle cuneiform seen on AP view diagnostic of Lisfranc injury widening of the interval between the 1st and 2nd ray seen on AP view may see bony fragment (fleck sign) in 1st intermetatarsal space represents avulsion of Lisfranc ligament from base of 2nd metatarsal diagnostic of Lisfranc injury dorsal displacement of the proximal base of the 1st or 2nd metatarsal seen on lateral view medial side of the base of the 4th metatarsal does not line up with medial side of cuboid seen on oblique view disruption of the medial column line (line tangential to the medial aspect of the navicular and the medial cuneiform) seen on oblique view CT indications useful for preoperative planning in the setting of comminuted bony injuries can help identify subtle injuries MRI indications can be used to confirm presence of purely ligamentous injury Differential Key Differential metatarsal base fracture metatarsal stress fracture tarsal fracture Treatment Nonoperative cast immobilization for 8 weeks indications certain non-displaced injuries that are stable with weight bearing nonoperative candidates nonambulatory patients presence of serious vascular disease severe peripheral neuropathy outcomes significantly lower functional and radiographic outcomes noted with non-operative management of displaced or transverse unstable injuries Operative temporary percutaneous pinning and delayed ORIF or arthrodesis indications displaced Lisfranc fracture dislocation injury with significant soft tissue swelling outcomes temporizing reduction and pinning and delayed definitive management with ORIF/arthrodesis has been shown to have decreased risk of wound infection in some low level studies. open reduction and rigid internal fixation indications any evidence of instability (> 2mm shift) favored in bony fracture dislocations as opposed to purely ligamentous injuries outcomes anatomic reduction required for a good result excluding hardware removal, no difference in complications or functional outcomes between ORIF and arthrodesis primary arthrodesis of the first, second and third tarsometatarsal joints indications (controversial) purely ligamentous arch injuries delayed treatment chronic deformity complete Lisfranc fracture dislocations (Type A or C2) outcomes function outcomes level 1 evidence demonstrates equivalent functional outcomes compared to primary ORIF medial column tarsometatarsal fusion shown to be superior to combined medial and lateral column tarsometatarsal arthrodesis some studies have shown that primary arthrodesis for complete Lisfranc fracture dislocations (Type A or C2) results in improved functional outcomes and quality of reduction compared to ORIF complications excluding hardware removal, no difference in complications between ORIF and arthrodesis midfoot arthrodesis indications destabilization of the midfoot's architecture with progressive arch collapse and forefoot abduction chronic Lisfranc injuries that have led to advanced midfoot arthrosis and have failed conservative therapy Technique Cast immobilization close followup with repeat radiographs should be performed to ensure no displacement with weightbearing with non-operative management Temporary percutaneous pinning technique reduce medial and lateral columns and stabilize with k-wires K-wires left in place until soft tissue swelling subsides can proceed with K-wire removal and ORIF/arthrodesis when soft tissues allow timing to definitive surgery can delay up to 2-3 weeks for soft tissue swelling to improve Open reduction and rigid internal fixation timing within 24 hours or delay operative treatment until soft tissue swelling subsides (up to 2-3 weeks) approach single or dual longitudinal incisions can be used based on injury pattern and surgeon preference longitudinal incision made in the web space between first and second rays first TMT joint is exposed between the long and short hallux-extensor tendons reduction & fixation reduce intercuneiform instability first fix first through third TMT joints with transarticular screws screw fixation is more stable than K-wire fixation can also span TMT joints with plates if MT base comminution is present postoperative care early midfoot ROM, protected weight bearing, and hardware removal (k-wires in 6-8 weeks, screws in 3-6 months) gradually advance to full weight bearing at 8-10 weeks if patient is asymptomatic and screws transfix only first through third TMT joints, they may be left in place preclude return to vigorous athletic activities for 9 to 12 months Primary arthrodesis of the first, second and third tarsometatarsal joints arthrodesis & fixation expose TMT joints and denude all joint surfaces of cartilage use cortical screws or square plate to fuse joints in the presence of both medial and lateral column dislocation, temporary lateral column pinning is recommended over lateral column arthrodesis postoperative care apply cast or splint for 6 weeks progress weight bearing between 6 and 12 weeks in removable boot full weight bearing in standard shoes by 12 weeks post-op Midfoot arthrodesis arthrodesis & fixation expose TMT joints and midfoot and remove cartilage from first, second, and third TMT joints add bone graft reduce the deformity using windlass mechanism variety of definitive fixation constructs exist postoperative care apply cast or splint for 6 weeks progress weight bearing between 6 and 12 weeks in removable boot begin weight bearing as tolerated at 12 weeks if evidence of healing is noted on radiographs Complications Posttraumatic arthritis incidence most common complication risk factors delayed treatment ORIF up to 80% risk with non-anatomic ORIF 54% of patients have symptomatic OA at ~10 years followed ORIF treatment treat advanced midfoot arthrosis with midfoot arthrodesis Malunion risk factors non-anatomic ORIF of Lisfranc injury treatment shoe modifications (cushioned heel with rocker sole) indications nonsurgical candidate malunion correction with primary arthrodesis indications surgical candidate that has failed non-operative treatment Nonunion risk factors smoking treatment revision arthrodesis with bone grafting indicated unless patient is elderly and low demand Hardware removal incidence ~75% of patients who undergo ORIF often a planned secondary procedure, required to allow the TMT joints to return to motion ~20% of patients following arthrodesis Deep infection incidence 3-4% risk factors significant soft tissue swelling at time of definitive surgery treatment irrigation and debridement, possible hardware removal. Planovalgus foot deformity risk factors non-operative management non-anatomic reduction following ORIF Prognosis Overall Impact on Life Quality significant variability regarding return to full activity given heterogenous group of patients in nearly all studies in the military population, at ~3 year follow-up, ~70% patients undergoing ORIF or primary arthrodesis were able to resume occupationally required daily running. Poor prognostic variables missed diagnosis easily missed and diagnosis is critical missed injuries can result in progressive foot planovalgus deformity result in chronic pain and ambulatory dysfunction
Technique Guide CPT Codes: 28306 Osteotomy, with or without lengthening, shortening or angular correction, metatarsal; first metatarsal Technique guides are not considered high yield topics for orthopaedic standardized exams including ABOS, EBOT and RC. Lisfranc Open Reduction and Internal fixation Ben Sharareh Orthobullets Team Orthobullets Team Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury
QUESTIONS 1 of 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Previous Next (OBQ20.14) A 47-year-old male sustains the injury depicted in figure A during a motorcycle accident. If the treating surgeon elects to perform a primary arthrodesis, which of the following statements is true regarding the patient's prognosis? QID: 215425 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Decreased quality of reduction compared to ORIF 1% (14/1321) 2 Higher wound infection rates compared to ORIF 0% (4/1321) 3 Decreased overall reoperation rate compared to ORIF 85% (1120/1321) 4 Better functional outcomes are seen with medial and lateral column arthrodesis 1% (19/1321) 5 Improved functional outcomes compared to ORIF 12% (160/1321) N/A Question Complexity E Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 3 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ19.236) A 54-year-old female patient presents to your clinic. She has been between jobs and only recently obtained health insurance again. For the past several years she has had chronic pain with ambulation and a progressive deformity to her right foot. Figure A is a clinical image. She endorses a traumatic event several years ago and had severe foot pain, however she did not see a physician at the time due to her lack of insurance. The pain improved however never completely resolved. What untreated injury did she most likely sustain? QID: 214138 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Navicular fracture 17% (207/1220) 2 Lisfranc injury 50% (605/1220) 3 Calcaneus fracture 19% (236/1220) 4 Anterior talofibular ligament injury 4% (45/1220) 5 Talar neck fracture 10% (122/1220) L 4 Question Complexity E Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 2 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (SBQ18FA.16) A 31-year-old male falls while coming down the stairs and reports immediate foot pain. Figure A shows the radiographs obtained by the ER and Figure B shows a physical examination of the patient. Based on this information a high clinical suspicion should be had for an injury to which structure? QID: 211275 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 The ligament running from the plantar calcaneus to the metatarsal heads 3% (57/2015) 2 The ligament connecting the medial calcaneus to the navicular 5% (102/2015) 3 The ligament connecting the anterolateral tibial to the anteromedial fibula 1% (19/2015) 4 The ligament connecting the first metatarsal base to the medial cuneiform 5% (98/2015) 5 The ligament connecting the second metatarsal base to the medial cuneiform 86% (1727/2015) L 2 Question Complexity A Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 5 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ13.167) A 22-year-old soccer player complains of foot pain after sustaining a twisting injury. A clinical photo is shown in Figure A. On the physical examination, he is focally tender in the midfoot region. Weight bearing radiographs are shown in Figure B. What is the optimal definitive treatment for this patient? QID: 4802 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Observation alone 0% (8/3505) 2 Weight bearing in a walking boot 1% (21/3505) 3 Immobilization in a cast for 8 weeks 1% (45/3505) 4 Open reduction and internal fixation of the injury 87% (3049/3505) 5 Open reduction and internal fixation of the injury along with lateral column stabilization 10% (361/3505) L 1 Question Complexity B Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ13.32) A 35-year-old motorcyclist is involved in a motor vehicle accident. He complains of pain and swelling in his right foot. Examination demonstrates dorso-medial midfoot tenderness. A clinical photograph is seen in Figure A. Supine and standing radiographs are seen in Figures B and C respectively. What is the most appropriate definitive treatment step? QID: 4667 FIGURES: A B C Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Non-weightbearing in a CAM walker boot for 6-10 weeks 1% (48/4586) 2 Weightbearing as tolerated in a CAM walker boot for 6-10 weeks 1% (30/4586) 3 Closed reduction and K-wire fixation of the first and second tarsometatarsal joints 3% (130/4586) 4 Open reduction and rigid internal fixation of the first and second tarsometatarsal joints 77% (3511/4586) 5 Open reduction and rigid internal fixation of the first to third tarsometatarsal joints and K-wire fixation of the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joints 18% (836/4586) L 3 Question Complexity A Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (SBQ12FA.9.1) A 25-year-old man presents to the emergency department after laying down his motorcycle at moderate speeds while avoiding a hazard in the road. He reports that during the accident his left foot was twisted under his motorcycle, and he now endorses severe pain with weight-bearing to the left foot. Radiographs are obtained in the emergency department. You discuss with the patient the possible treatment options, which include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and primary arthrodesis (PA). Which of the following is true regarding outcomes following ORIF as compared to PA? QID: 214874 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Equivalent cost with either ORIF or PA 2% (19/888) 2 Higher hardware removal rates with ORIF when compared to PA 87% (774/888) 3 Higher rate of infection requiring surgical treatment with PA when compared to ORIF 1% (6/888) 4 Increased risk of hardware failure with PA when compared to ORIF 1% (12/888) 5 Superior functional outcomes with PA when compared to ORIF 8% (73/888) L 5 Question Complexity E Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 2 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ12.13) A 25-year-old male sustains a left foot injury while playing soccer. His radiographs are shown in figures A and B. Which of the following techniques would lead to the best outcome when addressing his injury? QID: 4373 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Rigid cast immobilization 3% (137/5288) 2 Spanning medial column external fixation 0% (26/5288) 3 Percutaneous screw fixation of medial column of foot 6% (329/5288) 4 K-wire fixation of medial column of foot 2% (101/5288) 5 Open reduction and internal fixation of medial column of foot 88% (4656/5288) L 1 Question Complexity B Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 5 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ11.185) A 40-year-old male sustains a right foot injury after a head-on motor vehicle collision. He is unable to place weight on the foot to ambulate due to pain along the medial aspect of the foot. The pain is exacerbated with abduction of the midfoot. The patient denies pain along the lateral border of the midfoot. He is neurovascularly intact in the foot. An injury radiograph is shown in Figure A, while a clinical image of the foot is shown in Figure B. What is the most appropriate next step in management? QID: 3608 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Open reduction and arthrodesis of the medial two tarsometatarsal joints 58% (1932/3345) 2 External fixation of the foot followed with staged open reduction and screw fixation across the medial two tarsometatarsal joints 2% (74/3345) 3 Open reduction and screw fixation across the medial three tarsometatarsal joints and percutaneous pinning of the 4th and 5th tarsometatarsal joints 22% (732/3345) 4 Debridement of Morel-Lavallee lesion and external fixation of the foot followed with staged open reduction and screw fixation across the medial two tarsometatarsal joints 1% (24/3345) 5 Open reduction and screw fixation across the medial two tarsometatarsal joints with anatomic ligamentous reconstruction 17% (566/3345) L 4 Question Complexity A Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 1 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ09.244) A 24-year-old man sustains an injury to his left foot. Stress radiographs are seen in Figure A. Injury to which ligament or ligaments are needed to produce the transverse instability seen here? QID: 3057 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Spring ligament and bifurcate ligament 1% (40/2711) 2 Interosseous first cuneiform-second metatarsal ligament 32% (876/2711) 3 Interosseous first cuneiform-second metatarsal ligament and plantar ligament between the first cuneiform and the second and third metatarsals 58% (1582/2711) 4 Bifurcate ligament and Interosseous first cuneiform-second metatarsal ligament 4% (111/2711) 5 Long plantar ligament and plantar ligament between the first cuneiform and the second and third metatarsals 3% (84/2711) L 3 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 3 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ08.139) As an alternative to open reduction and internal fixation for the injury pattern seen in Figure A, what alternative treatment has been shown to be more effective? QID: 525 FIGURES: A B Type & Select Correct Answer 1 open reduction and arthrodesis of the medial and middle column, reduction and stabilization of the lateral column 80% (2475/3075) 2 open reduction and primary arthrodesis of the medial, middle, and lateral columns 11% (323/3075) 3 closed percutanous pinning of the medial, middle, and lateral columns 7% (211/3075) 4 closed reduction of the midfoot and casting 1% (46/3075) 5 partial weight bearing in removable boot 0% (8/3075) L 1 Question Complexity B Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 1 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ08.222) Which ligament connects the medial cuneiform to the base of the second metatarsal? QID: 608 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Spring ligament 1% (36/2590) 2 Chopart ligament 1% (21/2590) 3 Lisfranc ligament 97% (2511/2590) 4 Intermetatarsal ligament 0% (11/2590) 5 Calcaneofibular ligament 0% (5/2590) L 1 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 3 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ07.103) A 37-year-old man was involved in a high velocity motor vehicle accident 6 months ago. He spent 4 months in the ICU recovering from a severe head injury. He has now transitioned to a rehabilitation hospital and complains of left foot pain that becomes severe with weightbearing and attempted ambulation. Radiographs are provided in figures A-C. Which of the following is the best management? QID: 764 FIGURES: A B C Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Custom orthotics and physical therapy 1% (14/2238) 2 Closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of 1st through 3rd tarsometatarsal joints 2% (49/2238) 3 Open reduction internal fixation of 1st through 3rd tarsometatarsal joints 19% (419/2238) 4 Arthrodesis of 1st through 3rd tarsometatarsal joints 74% (1655/2238) 5 Tarsometatarsal arthrodesis and triple arthrodesis 4% (81/2238) L 2 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ06.100) A 30-year-old equestrian caught her foot in a stirrup 1 week ago and now complains of midfoot pain with difficulty bearing weight. Radiographs are shown in figure A. What treatment is most appropriate? QID: 211 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Non-weight bearing in an aircast 4% (100/2669) 2 Weight bearing as tolerated in a walking cast 3% (87/2669) 3 Modified-Brostrom procedure 3% (78/2669) 4 Delayed corrective osteotomy and arthrodesis of the medial column 2% (42/2669) 5 Arthrodesis of the medial tarsometatarsal joints 88% (2347/2669) L 1 Question Complexity A Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 5 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ06.132) A 54-year-old male sustained a right foot injury two years ago in a motor vehicle collision. The patient reports he was treated for a ligament injury in his foot with a non-weightbearing short leg cast for 2 months. Physical examination reveals no signs of infection and full sensation and motor strength in the foot. During gait examination he has pain during push-off of the right foot and loss of medial longitudinal arch height in the stance phase. A radiograph obtained at the time of initial injury is shown in Figure A. What is the most appropriate next step in management? QID: 318 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Lateral column lengthening procedure (Evans) 4% (61/1409) 2 Tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis 86% (1214/1409) 3 Talonavicular joint arthrodesis 3% (38/1409) 4 Lateral wedge closing calcaneal osteotomy (Dwyer) 2% (24/1409) 5 Subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joint arthrodesis (Triple) 5% (64/1409) L 1 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 2 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (OBQ04.1) A 54-year-old woman sustains a twisting injury to her foot. A radiograph is provided in Figure A. Which of the following is the most appropriate treatment? QID: 112 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 closed reduction and pinning 4% (102/2677) 2 closed reduction and casting 1% (27/2677) 3 open reduction and internal fixation 93% (2494/2677) 4 CAM walker and weight bearing as tolerated 1% (34/2677) 5 weight bearing as tolerated 0% (10/2677) L 1 Question Complexity B Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 3 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic
All Videos (13) Podcasts (2) Login to View Community Videos Login to View Community Videos Lisfranc’s and Midfoot Injuries. Kemal Gokkus Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury 3 weeks ago 96 views 5.0 (1) Lisfranc Injury - Everything You Need To Know - Dr. Nabil Ebraheim Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury 3/15/2022 5887 views 1.0 (1) Login to View Community Videos Login to View Community Videos Orthopaedic Summit Evolving Techniques 2020 Featured Lecture: Lisfranc Fractures: Treatment Guide - What I Have Learned When I Made My Mistakes - Michael Coughlin, MD Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury B 2/25/2022 695 views 4.3 (3) Foot & Ankle | Lisfranc Injury Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury Listen Now 22:52 min 10/18/2019 1892 plays 4.8 (14) Question Session⎜TKA Periprosthetic Fracture & Lisfranc Injury Orthobullets Team Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury Listen Now 17:18 min 11/11/2019 101 plays 5.0 (1) See More See Less
Lisfranc Injury in 43F (C102041) Travis Jones Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury C 4/30/2022 269 10 1 Mercy Health Lisfranc Injury in 28M (C101882) Adam Hoffman Bruce G. French Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury A 12/8/2021 7029 30 64 Lisfranc Fracture in 32F (C101811) Steven Mennona Foot & Ankle - Lisfranc Injury E 10/14/2021 537 7 0 See More See Less