• BACKGROUND
    • The less invasive stabilization system (LISS) is an internal fixator that utilizes unicortical locked screws for fixation of distal femur fractures. A question is whether locked unicortical screw fixation is sufficient, when compared with a standard implant such as a blade plate.
  • METHODS
    • Eight matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric femora were instrumented with either the LISS or a 95-degree blade plate. A 4-cm supracondylar gap fracture model was created and all bone-implant constructs were tested to failure in axial loading.
  • RESULTS
    • All constructs failed by plastic deformation of the implant. There was no significant difference between the LISS and the blade plate constructs with respect to load to failure.
  • CONCLUSIONS
    • Despite unicortical fixation axial loading to failure of the LISS did not result in implant/screw pull-out neither proximally nor distally. However, there does not appear to be a biomechanical advantage of using the LISS as opposed to a blade plate in bones with high bone mineral density.