Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 884

In scope icon L 2 B
QID 884 (Type "884" in App Search)
Appropriate treatment of the bimalleolar ankle fracture shown in Figure A includes which of the following?
  • A

Bridge plating of the fibula with oblique medial malleolar screws

3%

49/1600

Antiglide plating of the fibula with oblique medial malleolar screws

7%

115/1600

Intramedullary fibular screw with medial malleolar tension banding

1%

17/1600

Fibular plating with open correction of plafond impaction with medial malleolar antiglide plate

78%

1247/1600

Fibular plating with open correction of syndesmosis and oblique medial malleolar screws

10%

162/1600

  • A

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

A supination-adduction type injury consists of a vertical displaced medial malleolus fracture with marginal impaction of the tibial plafond and a low transverse fibula fracture. This type of injury is also associated with hyperdorsiflexion. The mechanism of a supination–adduction injury to the ankle results in a low transverse lateral malleolus avulsion and a vertical fracture of the medial malleolus secondary to inversion of the talus in the ankle mortise. The initial injury is a rupture of the lateral ankle ligaments or avulsion of the lateral malleolus. As the talus continues to invert, the medial malleolus is pushed to failure and fractures in a vertical fashion. The correct treatment for this type of injury is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with correction of the impacted articular component. Screws alone or a tension band would not provide a vertically stable construct.

In the referenced article by McConnell et al, 8 ankle fractures of this variety were all treated with open reduction and internal fixation, two with medial screws perpendicular to the fracture and the other 6 with medial screws and a one third tubular antiglide plate. 6 of the patients treated in the study had excellent results after 2.5 years of follow up, the other 2 had good results after 2.5 years.

Example of a representative fixation construct of the injury is shown in Illustration A.

ILLUSTRATIONS:
REFERENCES (1)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

4.2

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(28)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options