Select a Community
Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?
You are done for today with this topic.
Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?
Revision of the polyethylene liner, removal of the screw, and debridement of the osteolytic lesion with or without bone grafting
82%
930/1139
Revision of the acetabular component to a newer design without screws
3%
39/1139
Removal of the screw, revision of the polyethylene liner, and stem cell injection into the lytic lesion
1%
15/1139
Removal of the offending screw from the metal socket and placement of a new polyethylene liner in the existing socket
12%
138/1139
Select Answer to see Preferred Response
With a well-fixed acetabular metal shell and a localized osteolytic lesion, good outcomes can be expected with liner revision in this clinical scenario with retention of the metal socket, assuming no damage to the components or other unexpected findings during revision surgery. Here, complete cup revision is not warranted considering the appropriate implant position. Beaule and associates reviewed 83 consecutive patients (90 hips) in which a well-fixed acetabular component was retained in clinical scenarios such as the one described; no hip showed recurrence or expansion of periacetabular osteolytic lesions. If the metal cup is unstable, or if the osteolytic lesion is not amenable to debridement through the screw hole, acetabular component revision may be indicated.
3.1
(13)
Please Login to add comment