Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 6012

QID 6012 (Type "6012" in App Search)
There is increasing concern about the ethical relationship of orthopaedists to the orthopaedic equipment industry. Which of the following describes the most appropriate relationship?

Industry-paid travel, hotel (for the surgeon and spouse), and registration at a university-sponsored CME course

27%

155/579

Industry-paid travel and hotel for a faculty member at an industry-sponsored meeting that is not CME approved

35%

201/579

Consultation agreement ($50,000/annum) between the surgeon and the company for evaluation of the implant system with required oral reporting of impressions

18%

102/579

A restricted grant from a company to an orthopaedic residency program with the stipulation that the third year residents be sent to an industry-sponsored course

15%

84/579

Industry-paid dinner at a premium restaurant ($200/person) for surgeon and office staff at which a new set of surgical instrumentation is presented

6%

36/579

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

It is appropriate for orthopaedic surgeons to have relationships with industry as long as the relationship is for the good of the patient and no “quid pro quo” intent exists. A grant to cover registration at a CME event is appropriate but travel and hotel for a spouse is not. For orthopaedists who are faculty at a meeting sponsored by industry, it is appropriate for travel and expenses to be covered for that faculty member. Care must be exercised that the faculty member contributes in an amount appropriate for the expenses paid. The faculty member must ensure that information presented is unbiased and based on reasonable data and opinion. Consulting agreements should spell out specifically the duties of the agreement and payment should be appropriate for the time spent. There should be a defined work product for the consulting. Agreements that are thinly veiled payments for use of a company’s products must be avoided. In all cases, the agreements must stand up to public scrutiny. Restricted grants for specific industry-sponsored programs aimed at residents are not appropriate. Unrestricted grants intended for attendance at approved CME courses are appropriate. Dinners at which information is presented about topics that can aid in patient care are appropriate as long as the expense is reasonable ($100 or less/person) and the guest list includes individuals who can use the information in a patient case. Clearly a “premium” dinner for office staff to review new surgical instrumentation would not pass this test.

Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

1.3

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(31)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options