Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 5588

In scope icon L 2 A
QID 5588 (Type "5588" in App Search)
Figure A is a glenoid CT 3D reconstruction of a 26-year-old accountant who has recurrent shoulder instability. His first dislocation occurred after a fall while skiing. He has now sustained his third dislocation, which was reduced in the emergency department prior to being sent to your office. What is the most appropriate definitive treatment?
  • A

Immobilization in external rotation for 6 weeks

1%

44/4958

Arthroscopic bony Bankart repair

69%

3422/4958

Arthroscopic Remplissage procedure

4%

181/4958

Glenoid augmentation using coracoid transfer

22%

1097/4958

Glenoid augmentation using tricortical iliac crest graft

1%

72/4958

  • A

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

This patient has recurrent shoulder instability with a small bony defect of the anterior glenoid and no previous surgery. The most appropriate definitive management in this patient would be arthroscopic bony Bankart repair.

Older (>20 years old), recreational athletes with minor glenoid bone loss (<20% of the glenoid surface area) may be treated with soft tissue stabilization procedures using suture anchors. Goals of this procedure include tightening and repairing the torn ligament and labrum to the glenoid. Younger, contact sports athletes with large glenoid defect (>20%) may require bony augmentation type of procedures.

Lynch et al. review the clinical presentation, assessment and treatment algorithm for surgical management of bone loss associated with anterior shoulder instability. While defects larger than 25% of glenoid width should be managed with bony augmentation, they recommend soft-tissue stabilization in smaller defects.

Balg et al. analyzed 131 patients following Bankart procedure and identified following risk factors for failure: age <=20, competitive participation in contact sports, shoulder hyperlaxity, Hill-Sachs on AP radiograph, glenoid bone loss of contour on AP radiograph.

Using human cadaveric shoulders with various anterior glenoid defects sizes, The MOON Shoulder Group compared radiography, MRI and CT to determine the most reliable imaging modality for predicting bone loss. Three-dimensional CT, followed by regular CT were the most reliable and reproducible imaging modalities for predicting glenoid bone loss.

Figure A shows an en face sagittal 3D reconstruction of a glenoid with 10% surface area loss.

Incorrect Answers:
Answer 1: While closed reduction and immobilization are appropriate initial management, after failing conservative management, definitive management for recurrent shoulder dislocation is surgical.
Answer 3: Remplissage procedure is indicated in setting of large Hill-Sachs lesions.
Answers 4 & 5: Glenoid augmentation procedures using coracoid transfer (Bristow-Latarjet) and tricortical iliac crest graft would be indicated in setting of larger glenoid bone loss.

REFERENCES (3)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

1.9

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(17)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options