Select a Community
Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?
You are done for today with this topic.
Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?
Radial nerve injury
10%
272/2858
1 cm shortening
2%
49/2858
20 degree varus deformity
6%
163/2858
Brachial plexus injury
77%
2205/2858
Comminuted fracture pattern
5%
156/2858
Select Answer to see Preferred Response
Closed treatment of humeral shaft fractures with functional bracing is indicated in the vast majority of isolated injuries. An ipsilateral brachial plexus injury, however, is a contraindication to nonoperative management in a functional brace. Indications for operative management of humeral shaft fractures are limited given the high rates of union and ability of adjacent joints to compensate for deformity. Intact muscular tone is necessary to effect bony apposition in closed treatment with a functional brace. The absence of neurologic and muscle function in patients with a flail extremity leads to increased rates of nonunion and malunion. Rutgers and Ring conducted a retrospective review of patients managed with functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures at a single institution. The authors found a 90% overall union rate, with maintenance of shoulder and elbow motion. They caution though, that 29% of their proximal third fractures went on to nonunion. Figure A demonstrates an AP radiograph of a comminuted humeral shaft fracture with varus alignment. Incorrect Answers: Answer 1: Radial nerve injury is not an indication for operative management as the vast majority of radial nerve injuries recover with conservative management Answer 2: 1cm of shortening is an acceptable deformity with closed management Answer 3: 20 degree varus deformity is not an indication for operative management Answer 5: Fracture comminution is not a contraindication to functional bracing
4.0
(12)
Please Login to add comment