Select a Community
Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?
You are done for today with this topic.
Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?
Acetabular component failure was the least common reason for revision surgery
5%
303/5975
The number of revisions required for periprosthetic fractures was higher than that for deep infections
311/5975
Acetabular component failure was a more common reason for revision than deep infection
61%
3658/5975
Femoral component failure was a more common reason for revision than acetabular component failure
17%
1027/5975
Deep infection was the most common reason for revision
10%
615/5975
Select Answer to see Preferred Response
Failure of the acetabular component was the most common reason for revision at thirty-years for the Charnley "low-friction" total hip arthroplasty. The Charnley low-friction torque arthroplasty was introduced in 1962. It consisted of a 22mm diameter metal head, a cemented femoral component, and a cemented ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular component. Overall, the results were very good at thirty years with only 11.8% requiring revision. Charnley et al. in 1972 reported the 4-7 year results of 379 "low-friction" total hip arthroplasties. Overall, their short-term results were very good with only 2 loose acetabular components, 0 loose femoral components, and 1 late dislocation. Wroblewski et al. in 2009 reported the 30 year follow-up of 110 patients who underwent the "low-friction" total hip arthroplasty. 13 hips (11.8%) had to be revised. Of these, 5 were for problems with the acetabular component, 4 were for loosening of both components, 2 were for deep infection, 1 was from a loose femoral component, and 1 was from a fractured femoral component. Illustration A shows a radiograph after a Charnley low-friction total hip arthroplasty. Note the all poly-ethylene acetabular component. Illustration B shows the components used for the operation. Incorrect Answers: Answer 1: Acetabular component failure was the most common reason for revision. Answer 2: Revision for deep infection was more common than for fracture. Answer 4: Acetabular component failure was more common than femoral component failure. Answer 5: Acetabular component failure was the most common reason for revision.
3.0
(27)
Please Login to add comment