Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 4376

In scope icon L 3 C
QID 4376 (Type "4376" in App Search)
Which of the following statements is true regarding the thirty-year follow-up data obtained from the Charnley "low-friction" total hip arthroplasty?

Acetabular component failure was the least common reason for revision surgery

5%

303/5975

The number of revisions required for periprosthetic fractures was higher than that for deep infections

5%

311/5975

Acetabular component failure was a more common reason for revision than deep infection

61%

3658/5975

Femoral component failure was a more common reason for revision than acetabular component failure

17%

1027/5975

Deep infection was the most common reason for revision

10%

615/5975

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Failure of the acetabular component was the most common reason for revision at thirty-years for the Charnley "low-friction" total hip arthroplasty.

The Charnley low-friction torque arthroplasty was introduced in 1962. It consisted of a 22mm diameter metal head, a cemented femoral component, and a cemented ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular component. Overall, the results were very good at thirty years with only 11.8% requiring revision.

Charnley et al. in 1972 reported the 4-7 year results of 379 "low-friction" total hip arthroplasties. Overall, their short-term results were very good with only 2 loose acetabular components, 0 loose femoral components, and 1 late dislocation.

Wroblewski et al. in 2009 reported the 30 year follow-up of 110 patients who underwent the "low-friction" total hip arthroplasty. 13 hips (11.8%) had to be revised. Of these, 5 were for problems with the acetabular component, 4 were for loosening of both components, 2 were for deep infection, 1 was from a loose femoral component, and 1 was from a fractured femoral component.

Illustration A shows a radiograph after a Charnley low-friction total hip arthroplasty. Note the all poly-ethylene acetabular component. Illustration B shows the components used for the operation.

Incorrect Answers:
Answer 1: Acetabular component failure was the most common reason for revision.
Answer 2: Revision for deep infection was more common than for fracture.
Answer 4: Acetabular component failure was more common than femoral component failure.
Answer 5: Acetabular component failure was the most common reason for revision.

ILLUSTRATIONS:
REFERENCES (2)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

3.0

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(27)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options