Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 3651

In scope icon L 4 C
QID 3651 (Type "3651" in App Search)
A 9-year-old-female presents with her parents who have concerns regarding the appearance of her elbow (Figure A). Her past medical history is significant for a supracondylar fracture treated in a cast when as a younger child. She has no pain with motion and has 0 to 120 degrees range of motion. She does not have functional limitations but her parents would like to improve the appearance of her elbow. Which of the following procedures will correct the cubitus varus but may result in a lateral prominence?
  • A

Reverse V Osteotomy

2%

72/4418

Medial opening-wedge osteotomy with medialization of the distal fragment

27%

1211/4418

Step-cut osteotomy

6%

245/4418

Dome Osteotomy

8%

346/4418

Lateral closing-wedge osteotomy

57%

2511/4418

  • A

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Cubitus varus is one of the most common complications of a supracondylar fracture in a child. Malreduction leads to progressive varus deformity which is cosmetic displeasing, though functional use of the limb is usually not impacted.

Figure A demonstrates a cubitus varus deformity in a skeletally immature child who had a supracondylar fracture treated in a cast . While lateral closing-wedge osteotomy is the most commonly described procedure for correction of cubitus varus, it does not allow for medialization of the distal fragment. This corrects the radiographic deformity but may leave a lateral condylar prominence. (The lateral prominence can be minimized by making an oblique osteotomy with cuts of similar size). Due to the risk of of lateral prominence, other techniques are described.

Pankaj et al. performed dome osteotomy in 12 children for correction of cubitus varus. There were 7 excellent and 5 good outcomes and no child had prominence of the lateral condyle. The average carrying angle was corrected from 21.5 degrees of varus to 10.8 degrees of valgus with no loss or gain in range of motion.

Yun et. al. describe a reverse V osteotomy for correction of cubitus varus. 20 of 22 children treated had excellent outcomes and no child was found to have a lateral prominence. They noted the advantages of "better inherent stability, the avoidance of a prominent lateral condyle after correction and firm fixation allowing early movement."

Moradi et al. describe a step cut osteotomy and describe their experience with 13 patients, achieving 11 excellent and 2 good results.

Koch et al. describe an opening wedge osteotomy used in 4 patients to achieve a mean valgus correction of 21.75 degrees.

Illustration A (Pankaj et al.) shows the inherent problem with lateral closing wedge osteotomy (lateral condylar prominence) as compared to dome osteotomy. Illustration B (Pankaj et al.) shows a planned cubitus varus correction using dome osteotomy. Illustration C (Yun et al.) shows a schematic for planning a cubitus varus correction using a reverse V osteotomy. Illustration D (Moradi et al.) shows a schematic for planning a step cut osteotomy. Illustration E (Koch et al.) shows a diagram of an opening wedge osteotomy.

Incorrect Answers:
Answers 1-4 allow for medialization of the distal fragment to prevent the lateral condylar prominence that may contribute to residual deformity.

ILLUSTRATIONS:
REFERENCES (4)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

2.7

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(19)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options