Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 3311

QID 3311 (Type "3311" in App Search)
A design surgeon has created a new polyethlyene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty. Early clinical outcomes are comparable to conventional total hip arthroplasty. At 4 year follow-up, radioisometric analysis reveals 0.05 mm of annual wear in the surgeon's trial patients. Which of the following statements can be made from this data?

Osteolysis and subsequent component loosening will be minimal if the wear rate continues

67%

2542/3779

Osteolysis and subsequent component loosening will be greater than conventional hip arthroplasty if the wear rate continues

24%

900/3779

Component positioning should have no effect on wear rates of these bearings

7%

258/3779

All total hip arthroplasties should use this new polyethylene

1%

36/3779

Patient satisfaction will be greater at 10 year follow up

1%

21/3779

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Polyethylene wear rates have shown association with osteolysis and subsequent component loosening. Wear rates above 0.1 mm per year are at significant risk of osteolysis.

Dumbleton et al performed a meta-analysis of the literature concerning wear rates and osteolysis. They concluded that osteolysis was rarely observed when the wear rate was less than 0.1 mm per year.

Sakalkale et al reported on 10 year follow up of 60 total hips performed with a cementless, tapered, circumferentially coated femoral stem. They reported no osteolysis of the femoral component even though there was a high incidence of acetabular osteolysis.

Sochart et al reviewed 235 total hip arthroplasties performed by Charnley with 20 year follow-up. Osteolysis and revision was significantly associated with polyethylene wear rates. Average wear rates for hips that did not go on to revision was 0.09 mm per year compared to 0.19 mm per year for hips that were subsequently revised for loosening.

REFERENCES (3)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

2.9

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(39)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options