Select a Community
Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?
You are done for today with this topic.
Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?
Lower mean Short Form 36 (SF-36) score
66%
1417/2139
Higher mean score on the AAOS lower limb and foot and ankle outcomes questionnaire
9%
202/2139
Equivalent score on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
8%
179/2139
Lower Constant score
178/2139
Higher score on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
6%
135/2139
Select Answer to see Preferred Response
Turchin et al assessed the outcome of two groups of matched polytrauma patients, with the only difference being the presence of a foot injury in Group 1. They used three outcome tools, SF-36, WOMAC, and Modified Boston Children's Hospital Grading System to evaluate the the two groups at a minimum of 2 years from injury. The foot injury group, including all types of foot fractures, had a poor outcome when using any of these measures. Turchin concludes that “Foot injuries cause significant disability to multiply injured patients. More attention should be given to these injuries, and more aggressive management should be considered to improve the outcome of this group of multiply injured patients.” Tran et al compared polytrauma patients with foot injuries to 14 polytrauma patients without foot injury at a minimum of 12 months from injury. The AAOS lower limb and foot and ankle outcomes data collection questionnaire showed significantly lower scores in the foot injury group. The Constant score is used for evaluation of shoulder conditions.
1.4
(95)
Please Login to add comment