Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 213137

In scope icon L 3 A
QID 213137 (Type "213137" in App Search)
A 28-year-old male that sustained a closed left femoral shaft fracture 12 months ago and underwent intramedullary nailing presents with persistent pain in the right thigh. The patient walks with an antalgic gait. He denies any fevers or chills. His surgical sites are well healed and there are no signs of drainage. Serum ESR and CRP are 12 mm/hr (reference <20 mm/hr) and 0.9 mg/L (reference <2.5 mg/L), respectively. Figures A and B are the AP and lateral radiographs of the left femur. Which treatment option offers the highest chance of union and enables immediate weight-bearing?
  • A
  • B

Nail removal with compression plating and open bone grafting

9%

250/2786

Closed reamed exchange nailing

57%

1580/2786

Nail dynamization

9%

245/2786

Nail retention with plate augmentation and bone grafting

25%

688/2786

Electrical bone stimulator

0%

6/2786

  • A
  • B

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

The patient is presenting with a hypertrophic nonunion of the femur below the isthmus, which studies have shown to have a higher union rate when treated with plate augmentation. Retention of the nail allows for full weight-bearing postop.

Hypertrophic nonunion of the femur is the result of fracture site hypermobility with sufficient biology for healing. This is demonstrated with abundant callus formation without bridging trabeculae. Traditionally, this is treated with closed reamed exchange nailing which increased construct stiffness with a larger diameter nail, improved isthmic fit, and extrusion of reaming contents to the nonunion site. However, studies have demonstrated a higher union rate with open plate augmentation, bone grafting, and nail retention. This is due to the ability to correct nonunion site deformity, provide added compression at the nonunion site, and increase fracture site biology with bone graft.

Lynch et al. reviewed the literature regarding the treatment options for femoral nonunions. The literature suggests high union rates when hypertrophic nonunions are treated with exchanged reamed nailing. However, the use of augmentative plate fixation allows for further deformity correction. The proposed mechanism by which exchange reamed nailing is increased construct stiffness with a large diameter nail, usually by 1-2 mm, increased isthmic fit, and autogenous bone graft extrusion into the nonunion site.

Somford et al. performed a systematic review of the surgical treatment of femoral nonunions. Results demonstrate that exchange nailing provides a 73% union rate compared to plate augmentation of 96%. They speculated that there were increased indications for exchange nailing for oligotrophic nonunions in many of the included studies, which may have reduced the union rate. Further, plate augmentation does allow for deformity correction, which can further improve the union rate.

Figures A and B are the AP and lateral radiographs of the femur with hypertrophic nonunion as suggested with the abundant callus formation and broken distal interlock screws. Illustration A and B are the AP and lateral radiographs of the distal femur subsequent plate augmentation and fracture healing.

Incorrect Answers:
Answer 1: Compression plating and bone grafting provide deformity correction across the nonunion site and added biology, but there is loss of weight-bearing benefits with nail removal.
Answer 2: Closed reamed exchange nailing can provide healing of the nonunion by increasing the nail diameter and improving the isthmic fit, but studies have shown a lower union rate in subisthmic femoral nonunions compared to augmentation plating.
Answer 3: Nail dynamization provides the benefit of weight-bearing forces across the nonunion site to enhance the differentiation of osteoblasts and promote fracture healing. In hypertrophic nonunions, fracture site stability is the cause of nonunion rather than the lack of fracture site biology.
Answer 5: Electrical bone stimulators do not provide the added fracture stability that is required to address hypertrophic nonunion.

ILLUSTRATIONS:
REFERENCES (2)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

1.5

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(48)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options