Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 200

In scope icon L 2 C
QID 200 (Type "200" in App Search)
A minimal-incision technique with an incision no more than 10 centimeters has which of the following advantages compared to a standard incision for a total hip replacement?

lower post-operative visual analogue pain score

5%

229/4511

less transfusion requirement

3%

122/4511

shorter length of stay

4%

158/4511

better cosmetic result

87%

3917/4511

less pain medication requirement

2%

71/4511

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Ogonda et al randomized patients to standard (16cm) versus MIS incision (<10 cm). They found no significant difference with respect to postoperative hematocrit, blood transfusion requirements, pain scores, or analgesic use. There were also no differences in early walking ability or length of hospital stay and no differences in component alignment.

REFERENCES (1)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

3.1

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(39)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options