Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 1199

In scope icon L 2 D
QID 1199 (Type "1199" in App Search)
A 57-year-old female with degenerative hip arthritis has questions regarding mini-incision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with comparison to traditional THA. Which of the following statements is true regarding the mini-incision technique?

Reduced rate of hip dislocation

4%

117/3077

Increased hip range motion at 1 year

1%

30/3077

No significant difference in hip function at 1 year

92%

2825/3077

Less chance of surgical complications

2%

66/3077

Less chance of limping at 1 year

1%

22/3077

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Mini-incision THA has not been shown to have any clinical benefit in terms of hip function at long term followup. Proponents of this technique claim less soft tissue damage may allow for faster recovery. Digioia et al, looked at mini-incision THA vs standard THA using navigation. Although limp, distance walked, and stair function was better at 6 months with mini-incision THA, there were no significant differences in pain, function, or motion at 1 year.

REFERENCES (1)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

3.8

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(24)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options