Select a Community
Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?
You are done for today with this topic.
Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?
Total hip arthroplasty
1%
14/1762
Bipolar hemi-arthroplasty
11/1762
Sliding hip screw
3%
48/1762
Percutaneous screw fixation
0%
8/1762
Cephalomedullary nail fixation
95%
1672/1762
Select Answer to see Preferred Response
The radiographs demonstrate a reverse obliquity intertrochanteric femur fracture. Compared to the more stable intertrochanteric femur fracture, a reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fracture is not optimally treated with a sliding hip screw. Compression along a sliding hip screw is designed to create compression along the plane of the fracture, however in a reverse obliquity fracture pattern as seen here, shear force is created causing medial displacement of the femoral shaft and screw cutout. Haidukewych et al showed in their retrospective review of 55 consecutively treated reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures, that patients treated with a sliding hip screw had nearly a 56% failure rate (9/16). The failure rate of patients treated with a blade plate was only 13%. Sadowski et al showed in their prospective randomized trial in patients with a reverse obliquity or transverse intertrochanteric fracture who were randomized to either a 95 degree screw-plate or cephalomedullary nail a much higher failure rate for the plate-screw implant. Implant failure was seen in 7/19 patients treated with the 95 degree screw plate and only 1/30 in the intramedullary nail group. Both articles support the use of a blade plate or cephalomedullary nail for reverse obliquity fractures. An example of screw cutout and medial displacement is seen in Illustration A.
4.5
(24)
Please Login to add comment