• BACKGROUND
    • Recurrence of the hallux valgus deformity has various causes, and the incomplete reduction of sesamoids may be one of the important issues. However, we have seen several patients with postoperative lateral sesamoid displacement on anteroposterior (AP) standing radiographs who did not experience hallux valgus recurrence. Therefore, we hypothesized that lateral displacement of the sesamoid on AP standing radiographs does not cause hallux valgus recurrence.
  • METHODS
    • The study included 269 feet (185 patients) with hallux valgus treated with distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy. Mean patient age was 64.26 (range, 15-80) years. Patients were followed up for an average of 33.85 (range, 12-228) months between April 2002 and December 2019. The patients were divided into 4 groups, according to the presence or absence of hallux valgus recurrence and sesamoid reduction.
  • RESULTS
    • During outpatient follow-up, we discovered 99 feet (42.1%) in which hallux valgus did not recur despite lateral sesamoid displacement (grade IV-VII) on AP standing radiographs. Hallux valgus angle (HVA, 2.7 to 7.9 degrees), intermetatarsal angle (IMA, 4.6 to 6.2 degrees), and sesamoid grades (2.1 to 3.5) all deteriorated over time after surgery, and each indicator was statistically significantly altered, and changes in the 3 indicators had a statistically significant positive correlation. Changes in HVA and IMA between feet with and without sesamoid reduction on AP standing radiographs increased over time, with the differences in HVA (2.9 degrees) and IMA (0.9 degrees) being significant at final follow-up (P < .05 for each). Regardless of whether sesamoid reduction was achieved on AP standing radiographs, the final analysis showed that HVA and IMA in both groups worsened over time. Further, there were no differences between the 2 groups in the patterns of change over time.
  • CONCLUSION
    • In our cohort, postoperative sesamoid position on AP standing radiographs was not associated with hallux valgus recurrence based on radiographic criteria.
  • LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
    • Level III, retrospective comparative study.