• BACKGROUND
    • The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of pediatric patients who were surgically treated for a supracondylar humerus fracture by pediatric fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons (PFT) to the outcomes of those surgically treated by orthopaedic surgeons without pediatric fellowship training (NPFT). We hypothesized that there would be no differences in patient outcomes.
  • METHODS
    • A retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for a supracondylar humerus fracture with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction and percutaneous pinning (ORPP) at a regional level 1 trauma center over a 5-year period was performed. Exclusion criteria were inadequate follow up or absence of postoperative radiographs.
  • RESULTS
    • A total of 201 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pediatric-fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons treated 15.9% of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in carrying angle, Baumann's angle, or lateral rotation percentage at final follow up between PFT and NPFT groups. There was no permanent neurovascular compromise in either group. Patients treated by NPFT were more likely to return to the operating room for pin removal.
  • CONCLUSION
    • In this study, there was no difference in radiographic outcomes for patients with supracondylar humerus fractures surgically treated by either group. This suggests that pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures may be appropriately treated in communities without a pediatric-fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeon without compromised outcomes.Level of Evidence: III.