The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) document Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures With Vascular Injury. Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to improve patient care and obtain the best outcomes while considering the subtleties and distinctions necessary in making clinical decisions. The AUC clinical patient scenarios were derived from patient indications that generally accompany a pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture with vascular injury, as well as from current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and supporting literature. The 6 patient scenarios and 18 treatments were developed by the Writing Panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, the Review Panel, a separate group of volunteer physicians, independently reviewed these materials to ensure that they were representative of patient scenarios that clinicians are likely to encounter in daily practice. Finally, the multidisciplinary Voting Panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as Appropriate (median rating, 7 to 9), May Be Appropriate (median rating, 4 to 6), or Rarely Appropriate (median rating, 1 to 3).

Polls results

On a scale of 1 to 10, rate how much this article will change your clinical practice?

NO change
BIG change
88% Article relates to my practice (16/18)
11% Article does not relate to my practice (2/18)
0% Undecided (0/18)

Will this article lead to more cost-effective healthcare?

100% Yes (18/18)
0% No (0/18)
0% Undecided (0/18)

Was this article biased? (commercial or personal)

11% Yes (2/18)
88% No (16/18)
0% Undecided (0/18)

What level of evidence do you think this article is?

16% Level 1 (3/18)
5% Level 2 (1/18)
33% Level 3 (6/18)
33% Level 4 (6/18)
11% Level 5 (2/18)