A rupture of the entire fibers of the anterior cruciate ligament leads to knee instability due to increased anterior tibial translation and increased internal tibial rotation. The influence of isolated deficiency of the anteromedial or posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament on the resulting knee kinematics have not yet been reported.

Transection of the anteromedial bundle will lead to increased anterior tibial translation at 90 degrees. Transection of the posterolateral bundle will show an increased anterior tibial translation as well as a combined rotatory instability at 30 degrees.

Controlled laboratory study.

Kinematics of the intact knee were determined in response to a 134-N anterior tibial load and a combined rotatory load of 10 N.m valgus and 4 N.m internal tibial rotation using a robotic/universal force moment sensor testing system. Subsequently, the fibers of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundle were resected in an alternating order and the new translation in response to the same external loading conditions measured. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2-way ANOVA test.

Transection of the anteromedial bundle increased anterior tibial translation at 60 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion significantly. Isolated transsection of the posterolateral bundle increased anterior tibial translation in response to 134-N anterior load at 30 degrees of knee flexion significantly and resulted in a significant increase in combined rotation at 0 degrees and 30 degrees in response to a combined rotatory load compared with the intact knee and isolated resection of the anteromedial bundle.

The anteromedial and posterolateral bundles stabilize the knee joint in response to anterior tibial loads and combined rotatory loads in a synergistic way.

The results of the current study suggest that, from a biomechanical point of view, it may be beneficial to reconstruct both bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament to better restore normal anterior tibial translation and combined rotation.

Polls results

On a scale of 1 to 10, rate how much this article will change your clinical practice?

NO change
BIG change
86% Article relates to my practice (13/15)
6% Article does not relate to my practice (1/15)
6% Undecided (1/15)

Will this article lead to more cost-effective healthcare?

46% Yes (7/15)
46% No (7/15)
6% Undecided (1/15)

Was this article biased? (commercial or personal)

0% Yes (0/15)
93% No (14/15)
6% Undecided (1/15)

What level of evidence do you think this article is?

0% Level 1 (0/15)
46% Level 2 (7/15)
20% Level 3 (3/15)
20% Level 4 (3/15)
13% Level 5 (2/15)