Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 4544

In scope icon L 3 C
QID 4544 (Type "4544" in App Search)
A 36-year-old male involved in a high speed motor vehicle accident is found on exam to have Grade 2 of 5 motor strength in 80% of his key muscle groups in his lower extremity. His perianal sensation and rectal tone are intact. A bulbocavernosus reflex is present. His sensation is decreased from a point at the intersection of the mid-clavicular line and the 4th intercostal space at the level of the nipples distally. Based on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification system, what ASIA grade is he?

ASIA A

1%

36/4006

ASIA B

18%

719/4006

ASIA C

73%

2913/4006

ASIA D

7%

299/4006

ASIA E

0%

15/4006

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

This patient is presenting with an ASIA C high thoracic level injury.

The ASIA classification is used to determine severity of injury. ASIA A is a complete spinal cord injury. ASIA B is characterized by preserved sensory function but no motor function below the neurological level. ASIA C is characterized by preserved motor function below the neurological level, but more than half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade less than 3. ASIA D is characterized by preserved motor function below the neurological level, and at least half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of 3 or more. ASIA E is a normal exam.

Waters et al. followed 148 patients prospectively and demonstrated that no individual presenting with a complete neurologic level of injury above T9 ever regained any lower extremity motor function. Patients with a complete neurologic level below T9 had some return of function. One fifth of patients with complete injuries below T12 were eventually able to ambulate using conventional orthoses and crutches.

Harrop et al. reviewed 150 patients treated over a 10 year period with a spinal cord injury between T4 and S5. Patients were stratified based on level of injury, initial American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), age, race, and etiology. A total of 92.9% of lumbar (conus) patients neurologically improved one ASIA level or more compared with only 22.4% of thoracic or thoracolumbar spinal cord-injured patients.

Illustration A is the ASIA worksheet that helps to classify a spinal cord injury. Illustration B shows the ASIA classification in chart format.

ILLUSTRATIONS:
REFERENCES (2)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

3.2

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(26)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options