Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 216901

In scope icon L 2
QID 216901 (Type "216901" in App Search)
A 42-year-old male construction worker presents with right shoulder pain that has progressively worsened over the last several months. He was seen by his PCP for this, who prescribed physical therapy and NSAIDs. Despite this, the patient remained symptomatic and with difficulty performing his job duties. His PCP ordered an MRI of the right shoulder, which is depicted in figure A. The patient was then referred to a primary care sports medicine clinic where an ultrasound-guided barbotage of the lesion was performed with minimal effect on his symptoms. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
  • A

Isolated rotator cuff repair

16%

210/1319

Bone scan

4%

52/1319

Obtain MRI arthrogram of the right shoulder

9%

113/1319

EMG

1%

9/1319

Arthroscopic debridement

70%

927/1319

  • A

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

The patient is presenting with suspected calcific tendonitis of the right shoulder. The next best step in management would be arthroscopic debridement of the calcification.

Calcific tendonitis of the shoulder is a painful condition that results in calcium hydroxyapatite deposition into the tendons of the rotator cuff. It typically affects patients between 30-60 years of age and is associated with diabetes and hypothyroidism. Initial treatment consists of physical therapy with anti-inflammatory medications and corticosteroid injections as needed. A needle aspiration and barbotage is another nonoperative treatment option. Refractory cases are treated surgical decompression with or without subacromial decompression.

Balke et al. performed a case series of 70 shoulders that underwent arthroscopic treatment consisting of calcium deposit excision with or without subacromial decompression. The authors reported at 6 years follow-up there was a significant improvement in shoulder pain and function compared to preoperative scores, but still diminished compared to the healthy shoulder. The authors concluded mid-term results of arthroscopic treatment are good but there is a higher incidence of rotator cuff tears in the operative shoulder and no apparent benefit of subacromial decompression.

Marder et al. performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment of calcific tendonitis. They reported a long time to resumption of activity without pain in patients undergoing debridement with subacromial decompression compared to debridement alone. They concluded debridement alone for calcific tendonitis is effective and permits quicker return to baseline activity.

Ark et al. performed a retrospective study of 23 patients with calcific tendonitis treated with arthroscopic debridement and subacromial decompression. They reported complete calcium removal in 9 patients and 91% of patients experiencing either good or satisfactory results at 26 months follow-up. They concluded arthroscopic debridement with subacromial decompression is a good treatment option for calcific tendonitis.

Zubler et al. performed a retrospective study of 22 patients evaluated for calcific tendonitis with MR arthrography. They reported a poor inter-rater agreement or poor sensitivity of detecting calcific tendonitis alone. They concluded calcific tendonitis should not be evaluated with corresponding radiographs.

Figure A is a coronal T2 MRI with a hypointense signal in the supraspinatus tendon, which is concerning for calcific tendonitis.

Incorrect answers
Answer 1: Performing an isolated rotator cuff repair without debridement of the calcium deposit will not resolve the patient's symptoms.
Answer 2: A bone scan would provide no additional diagnostic utility in this case.
Answer 3: An MRI arthrogram would provide no added diagnostic benefit in this case.
Answer 4: An EMG would not provide any additional diagnostic utility in this case.

REFERENCES (4)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

4.2

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(6)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options