Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 1153

In scope icon L 3 C
QID 1153 (Type "1153" in App Search)
In a patient with -2.5mm of ulnar variance, which of the following statements best describes the distribution of compressive load across the wrist?

Approximately 50% of the wrist load is accepted by distal radius and 50% is accepted by the distal ulna

1%

39/3610

Approximately 80% of the wrist load is accepted by the distal radius and 20% is accepted by the distal ulna

28%

1022/3610

Approximately 80% of the wrist load is accepted by the distal ulna and 20% is accepted by the distal radius

3%

103/3610

Approximately 95% of the wrist load is accepted by the distal radius and 5% is accepted by the distal ulna

63%

2264/3610

Approximately 60% of the wrist load is accepted by the distal radius and 40% is accepted by the distal ulna

5%

166/3610

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Ulnar variance describes the cranio-caudal position of the distal ulna in relation to the distal radius at the wrist. In neutral ulnar variance, 80% of the compressive load across the wrist is accepted by the distal radius, and 20% is accepted by the distal ulna. With -2.5mm of ulnar variance (negative ulnar variance), approximately 5% of the wrist load is accepted by the distal ulna. With +2.5mm of ulnar variance (positive ulnar variance), approximately 40% of the wrist load is accepted by the distal ulna.

As discussed in the biomechanical study by Palmer and Werner, the loading characteristics of the wrist are dependent on the radio/ulnar variance. Specifically, a 2.5 mm increase in ulnar variance increases load accepted by ulno-carpal joint from 18% to 42%; a 2.5 mm decrease in the ulno-carpal variance will decrease the load accepted by the ulno-carpal joint to 4.3%.

Friedman and Palmer review the clinical diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome.

REFERENCES (2)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

3.9

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(30)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options