Forms Spinal cord monitoring is a method to detect injury to the spinal cord during operative procedures. most common forms are EMG (electromyography) SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) 25% sensitive, 100% specific MEP (motor evoked potentials) 100% sensitive, 100% specific Anatomy Spinal cord pathways sensory (afferent) dorsal column spinothalamic tract motor (efferent) lateral corticospinal tract ventral corticospinal tract Blood supply consists of anterior spinal artery primary blood supply of anterior 2/3 of spinal cord, including both the lateral corticospinal tract and ventral corticospinal tract posterior spinal artery (right and left) primary blood supply to the dorsal sensory columns Sensory evoked potenitals (SEPs) Function monitor integrity of dorsal column sensory pathways of the spinal cord Technique signal initiation lower extremity usually involves stimulation of posterior tibial nerve behind ankle upper extremity usually involve stimulation of ulnar nerve signal recording transcranial recording of somatosensory cortex Advantages reliable and unaffected by anesthetics Disadvantages not reliable for monitoring the integrity of the anterior spinal cord pathways reports exist in literature of an ischemic injury leading to paralysis despite normal SEP monitoring during surgery Intraoperative considerations loss of signals during distraction mandates immediate removal of device and repeated assessment of monitoring signals decrease in amplitude of 50% and/or 10% prolongation in latency is considered a significant change Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Function monitor integrity of lateral and ventral corticospinal tract of the spinal cord Technique signal initiation transcranial stimulation of motor cortex signal recording muscle contraction in extremity (gastroc, soleus, EHL of lower extremity) Advantages effective at detecting a ischemic injury (loss of anterior spinal artery) in anterior 2/3 of spinal cord Disadvantages often unreliable due to effects of anesthesia Intraoperative considerations loss of signals during distraction mandates immediate removal of device and repeated assessment of monitoring signals greater than 100 V increase in threshhold is suggestive of an early injury >50% decrease in MEP amplitude is considered significant Mechnical Electromyography (spontaneous) Introduction monitor integrity of specific spinal nerve roots Technique concept microtrauma to nerve root during surgery causes deplorization and a resulting action potential in the muscle that can be recorded contact of a surgical instrument with nerve root will lead to "burst activity" and has no clinical significance significant injury or traction to a nerve root will lead to "sustained train" activity, which may be clinically significance signal initiation mechanical stimulation (surgical manipulation) of nerve root signal recording muscle contraction in extremity Advantages allows monitoring of specific nerve roots Disadvantages may be overly sensitive (e.g., sustained train activity does not neccessary reflect nerve root injury) Electrical Electromyography (triggered) Introduction allows detection of a breached pedicle screw Technique concept bone conducts electricity poorly an electrically stimulated pedicle screw that is confined to bone will not stimulate the nerve root if there is a breach in a pedicle, stimulation of the screw will lead to activity of that specific nerve root signal initiation electrical stimulation of placed pedicle screw signal recording muscle contraction in extremity thresholds <8 mA may be indicative of breach Advantages allows monitoring of specific nerve roots Disadvantages may be overly sensitive (e.g., sustained train activity does not neccessary reflect nerve root injury)
QUESTIONS 1 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Previous Next Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ18.46) A 6-year-old patient is undergoing a T2-pelvis posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis due to Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy. During the placement of pedicles screws under fluoroscopic guidance, there is an 80% decrease in amplitude of transcranial motor evoked potentials diffusely. The patient is currently under propofol anesthesia and the mean arterial pressure is 55 mm Hg. What is the best course of action? QID: 212942 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Proceed with instrumentation 1% (31/2373) 2 Remove the pedicle screw and repeat testing 38% (908/2373) 3 Switch to halogenated gas anesthesia 2% (41/2373) 4 Restore MAP to >90 mm Hg and repeat testing 56% (1321/2373) 5 Perform a Stagnara Wake-up test 2% (55/2373) L 1 Question Complexity A Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 4 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic (SBQ12SP.2) Which of the following statements regarding Somatosensory Evoked Potenitals (SSEPs) as a method to detect neurologic injury during spinal deformity surgery is true? QID: 3700 Type & Select Correct Answer 1 SSEPs are not reliable with respect to monitoring the integrity of the anterior spinal cord pathways 43% (3045/7034) 2 The minimum criteria for determining potentially significant SSEP changes include a 10% decrease in amplitude, and a 50% increase in latency. 26% (1856/7034) 3 Signal initiation is performed with transcranial stimulation of the somatosensory cortex 7% (514/7034) 4 SSEPs are more sensitive to the effect of anesthesia than MEPS (motor-evoked potentials) 15% (1051/7034) 5 They monitor the integrity of the anterior spinothalamic tract 7% (520/7034) L 5 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 1 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK (OBQ06.233) A 75-year-old female with cervical spondylotic myelopathy is undergoing a cervical corpectomy with placement of an interbody cage as seen in Figure A. Immediately following placement of the cage, there is a 75% decrease in the lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and a loss in the motor-evoked potentials (tceMEPs). What is the next most appropriate step in management? QID: 244 FIGURES: A Type & Select Correct Answer 1 Proceed with placing an anterior plate as planned 0% (8/2030) 2 Correct the kyphotic deformity by placing a larger interbody strut cage 1% (19/2030) 3 Remove strut cage and monitor for return of motor and sensory signals. 92% (1876/2030) 4 Observe for 20 minutes and then repeat motor and sensory neurophysiologic testing 5% (106/2030) 5 Close the wound and proceed with an emergency MRI 1% (11/2030) L 1 Question Complexity C Question Importance Select Answer to see Preferred Response SUBMIT RESPONSE 3 Review Tested Concept Review Full Topic Sorry, this question is for PEAK Premium Subscribers only Upgrade to PEAK
All Videos (1) Podcasts (1) Orthopaedic Summit Evolving Techniques 2020 Decision Making: When To Stop Rehab & Perform Surgery - Marc J. Levine, MD Spine - Spinal Cord Monitoring 9/8/2022 360 views 0.0 (0) Spine⎪Spinal Cord Monitoring Orthobullets Team Spine - Spinal Cord Monitoring Listen Now 16:35 min 1/14/2020 403 plays 5.0 (2)