Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 216688

In scope icon L 2
QID 216688 (Type "216688" in App Search)
Which of the following is the most important relative contraindication to mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Medial patellofemoral arthritis

11%

166/1463

Age >70 years old

3%

50/1463

Flexion contraction of 10 degrees

13%

189/1463

Prior failed ACL reconstruction

67%

975/1463

Previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO)

5%

72/1463

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

ACL deficiency is a traditional/relative contraindication to mobile bearing UKA due to the risk of component spinout.

Unicompartmental knees rely on normal knee biomechanics to preserve motion and stability at the knee. The indications for unicondylar knee replacements are evolving. Using the original published criteria, indications for unicondylar replacement include: non-inflammatory arthritis, mechanical axis deviation <10 degrees from neutral in varus or 5 degrees in valgus, intact ACL, flexion contracture <15 degrees, no patellofemoral symptoms (although radiographic arthritis alone at the PF joint is not a contraindication), flexion to 90 degrees or greater, age >60, low activity demand, and weight <82 kilograms. While some authors argue that fixed bearing UKA may still be performed in patients with ACL deficiencies, mobile bearing UKA remains contraindicated given the risk of spinout.

In a study of 10 year follow up, Murray et al, defined the following indications for UKA: fixed flexion deformity <15 degrees, correctable varus deformity (indicating a competent medial collateral ligament), full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment, and non-inflammatory arthritis. Patellofemoral arthritis is not a contraindication, nor is moderate obesity.

The second Murray reference is a review of the indications and techniques for mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as mentioned above.

Engh et al review fixed bearing UKA in patients with ACL deficiency. They report revision rates between UKAs with and without intact ACLs were similar in the absence of clinical instability. Six-year UKA survivorship was 94% in ACL-deficient knees and 93% in ACL-intact knees. They conclude that ACL deficiency does not effect survivorship of in patients receiving fixed bearing UKA.

Incorrect Answers:
Answer 1: Medial patellofemoral disease is not an absolute contraindication for UKA.
Answer 2: Age is not a contraindication for UKA. Original patient description was that of an older low demand patient.
Answer 3: UKA can successfully be performed in patients with a flexion contraction <15 degrees.
Answer 5: Prior HTO does not affect clinical outcomes following UKA. This is not an absolute contraindication for mobile bearing UKA.

REFERENCES (3)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

1.6

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(12)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options