Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 6035

In scope icon N/A E
QID 6035 (Type "6035" in App Search)
A 75-year-old patient returns for follow-up after undergoing bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). The right hip is a hybrid THA performed 12 years ago, whereas the left hip is a cementless THA performed 10 years ago. Both acetabular components are the same type, same size, and from the same manufacturer. Both femoral heads are 28-mm cobalt-chromium components. What is the most likely explanation for the advanced polyethylene wear in one hip?

Presence of a third-party abrasive particle

31%

47/153

Disproportionate use of the limbs by the patient

7%

10/153

Defective femoral head

0%

0/153

Method of fixation of the femoral component

19%

29/153

Method of sterilization and shelf life of the polyethylene

43%

66/153

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Over the past three decades, gamma irradiation and air has been the most common method of sterilizing polyethylene used in total joint arthroplasty. This method of sterilization results in breakage of the chemical bonds within the polymer. While this promotes cross-linking, it also leaves the polyethylene vulnerable to oxidation, especially if packaged in an air environment. Oxidation has been shown to decrease polyethylene’s molecular weight, ultimate tensile strength, elongation, and toughness which results in a stiffer, more brittle material that is less resistant to wear. Severity of oxidation and a decrease in mechanical properties have been shown to be related to the length of time that the component is exposed to air (the shelf life). Currier and associates studied the clinical performance of gamma irradiated in air polyethylene components that had been shelf aged. They demonstrated that for the first 5 years of shelf life, polyethylene oxidized rather slowly. However, polyethylene components with a shelf life of more than 5 years would be expected to have minimal mechanical toughness and would likely fail rapidly if implanted. Bohl and associates evaluated 135 patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty. Survivorship at 5 years was 100% for components with a shelf life of less than 4 years, 89% for components with a shelf life of 4 to 8 years, and 79% for components with a shelf life of more than 8 years. Sychterz and associates reported no correlation between shelf life and true wear rates for components with a shelf life of less than 3 years. In summary, both in vivo and in vitro data suggest that shelf life in excess of 3 to 5 years has a direct effect on wear of polyethylene.

REFERENCES (3)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

1.1

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(54)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options