Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 5609

In scope icon L 4 B
QID 5609 (Type "5609" in App Search)
A 68-year-old male presents with gait instability, clumsiness of the hands, and the MRI images shown in Figure A. You decide to proceed with surgical decompression. When planning your surgical treatment, it is important to note that compared to a posterior approach, the anterior procedure has:
  • A

Higher risk of infection

2%

87/4447

Lower risk of C5 radiculopathy

17%

735/4447

Higher over-all complication rate

16%

710/4447

Lower average blood loss

62%

2773/4447

Increased rate of numbness to the long finger and wrist flexion weakness

3%

116/4447

  • A

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Surgical decompression of cervical myelopathy via an anterior procedure has lower reported blood loss compared to a posterior procedure.

Cervical myelopathy has a progressive course and therefore if there is evidence of functional impairment surgical decompression is indicated. Either an anterior decompression or posterior decompression can be used depending on a variety of factors including number of levels involved and sagittal alignment of the cervical spine. In general, a posterior approach is used when three or more levels are involved and the spine is in neutral or lordotic alignment.

Fehlings et al. did a prospective study on the risks of complications associated with surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. They found that combined anterior and posterior procedures had a significantly higher rate of complication than either anterior-only or posterior-only procedures. Posterior procedures had a higher rate of wound infections compared to anterior. They found no statistical difference in the over-all complication rate, incidence of C5 radiculopathy, or dysphagia between an anterior-only or posterior-only procedure.

Fehlings et al. did a prospective study on outcomes following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. At one year follow-up they found a significant improvement in mJOA score, Nurick grade, NDI score, and all SF-36v2 dimensions. With the exception of mJOA scores, these improvements were not statistically related to severity of disease.

Liu et al. performed a meta-analysis of outcomes following surgical decompression of cervical myelopathy. They found outcomes following anterior procedures were better than those for posterior procedures when there were less than 3 affected levels. With 3 or greater levels, no statistical difference in outcomes could be found between the two approaches. They note none of their reviewed publications represent high-quality prospective randomized trials.

Figure A is a sagittal MR image of the cervical spine showing multi-level degenerative disease with cord compression consistent with cervical myelopathy.

Incorrect Answers:
Answer 1: Incidence of wound infection was found to be higher in patients following a posterior procedure.
Answer 2: No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of C5 radiculopathy between the anterior or posterior procedures.
Answer 3: No statistically significant difference was found in the over-all complication rate between the anterior or posterior procedures.
Answer 5: No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of C7 radiculopathy between the anterior or posterior procedures.

REFERENCES (3)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

3.2

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(23)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options