• PURPOSE
    • To compare outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with and without rotator cuff (RC) tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears.
  • METHODS
    • We reviewed records of all patients that received RSA for primary OA or secondary OA. All patients had preoperative radiographs, computed tomography arthrography (CTA) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their shoulders to assess their etiology, glenoid morphology, and fatty infiltration. Pre- and postoperative (at minimum follow-up of 2 years) Constant scores and range of motion were compared between patients that had RSA for primary OA with and without RC tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears.
  • RESULTS
    • Of the initial cohort of 605 shoulders (583 patients), 153 were lost to follow-up (25.3%), 25 required revision with implant removal (4.1%), and 13 died of causes unrelated to the surgery (2.1%), and left a final cohort of 414 patients. Of the final cohort, 97 had primary OA with intact RC, 62 had primary OA with RC tears, and 255 had secondary OA. Postoperative Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC (73.8±14.3), compared to both primary OA with RC tears (66.1±14.6, p<0.001) and secondary OA (64.1±14.8, p<0.001). There were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores between primary OA with RC tears and secondary OA.
  • CONCLUSION
    • At 2 or more years following RSA, Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC, compared to either primary OA with RC tears or secondary OA, whereas there were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores of shoulders that had primary OA with RC tears versus secondary OA. The authors recommend distinguishing primary OA with intact RC from primary OA with RC tears, as the two have considerably different characteristics and prognosis following RSA.