INTRODUCTION:
Pin site infection is a critical issue for patients' safety in skeletal fixation using percutaneous pins or wires. Closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wires fixation are the mainstay of treatment in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. Little information is available in the literature about the optimal regimen of pin site care in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We performed a prospective comparative study of 61 children with supracondylar humeral fractures between June 2011 and March 2013 after approval by the institutional review board. They were allocated into two groups of different postoperative pin site care methods by the emergency department arrival date and received fracture fixation within 24 h. Postoperatively, 30 children underwent pin site cleaning every day whereas the other 31 patients did not have the pin sites cleaned until the pins removal 4-6 weeks later.

RESULTS:
Demographic data were not significantly different between the two groups. The infection rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent daily pin site care (90.3 vs. 53.3 %, p = 0.001). Of the 144 pin sites, infection occurred at 42 (57.5 %) pin sites in the daily care group and at 19 (26.8 %) pin sites in the non-care group. The number of telephone consultations for postoperative care was significantly higher in the daily care group (1.0 vs. 0.27 call/case, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS:
Daily pin site care was associated with a higher infection rate and greater stress in postoperative care that required more telephone consultations. The study results could not support daily pin site care. Careful observation of pin sites was recommended in the treatment of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.





Polls results
1

On a scale of 1 to 10, rate how much this article will change your clinical practice?

NO change
BIG change
25% Article relates to my practice (1/4)
75% Article does not relate to my practice (3/4)
0% Undecided (0/4)
2

Will this article lead to more cost-effective healthcare?

100% Yes (4/4)
0% No (0/4)
0% Undecided (0/4)
3

Was this article biased? (commercial or personal)

25% Yes (1/4)
75% No (3/4)
0% Undecided (0/4)
4

What level of evidence do you think this article is?

0% Level 1 (0/4)
50% Level 2 (2/4)
50% Level 3 (2/4)
0% Level 4 (0/4)
0% Level 5 (0/4)