|
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3042/images/calcific tendinitis.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3042/images/ombro_calc.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3042/images/example.jpg
https://upload.orthobullets.com/topic/3042/images/usevan.jpg
Introduction
  • Calcification and tendon degeneration near the rotator cuff insertion               
    • associated with subacromial impingement
  • Epidemiology
    • demographics
      • typically affects patients aged 30 to 60
      • more common in women
    • location
      • supraspinatus tendon is most often involved
    • risk factors
      • association with endocrine disorders
        • diabetes
        • hypothyroidism
  • Pathophysiology
    • unknown etiology
    • pathoanatomy
      • three stages of calcification
        • precalcific 
          • fibrocartilaginous metaplasia of the tendon
          • clinically this stage is pain-free
        • calcific
          • subdivided into three phases
            • formative phase 
              • characterized by cell-mediated calcific deposits
              • +/- pain
            • resting phase
              • lacks inflammation or vascular infiltration
              • +/- pain
            • resorptive phase
              • characterized by a phagocytic resorption and vascular infiltration
              • clinically this phase is most painful
        • postcalcific
    • cellular biochemistry
      • calcium hydroxyapatite crystals are deposited 
      • key molecular pathways involved
        • osteopontin
        • cathepsin K
        • transglutaminase 2
Classification
 
Gartner and Heyer Classification of Calcific Tendinitis  
Type I          • Well circumscribed, dense calcification, formative    
Type II  • Soft contour/dense or sharp/transparent
Type III
 • Translucent and cloudy appearance without clear circumscription, resorptive    

 

Mole et al. Classification of Calcific Tendinitis 
Type A   • Dense, homogeneous, sharp contours          
Type B  • Dense, segmented, sharp contours
Type C
 • Heterogeneous, soft contours
Type D  • Dystrophic calcifications at the insertion of the rotator cuff tendon

Presentation
  • History
    • similar to the clinical presentation of subacromial impingement
  • Symptoms
    • atraumatic pain (most severe in resorptive phase)
    • catching, crepitus
    • mechanical block
  • Physical exam
    • inspection
      • supraspinatus fossa muscle atrophy
    • motion
      • decreased active range of motion
      • scapular dyskinesia
      • may be associated with a decrease in rotator cuff strength 
    • provocative tests
      • subacromial impingement signs
Imaging
  • Radiographs
    • views
      • AP, supraspinatus outlet, and axillary views show supraspinatus calcification
      • internal rotation view shows infraspinatus and teres minor calcification
      • external rotation view shows subscapularis calcification
    • findings
      • deposits usually 1 to 1.5cm from supraspinatus tendon insertion
      • useful to monitor progression over time 
        • allow assessment of location, density, extent, and delineation of deposit  
  • CT
    • indications
      • rarely required
      • may characterize the three-dimensional shoulder anatomy
  • MRI
    • indications
      • limited utility in the diagnosis of calcific tendonitis
      • consider in patients with refractory pain as it can assess for concomitant pathology (e.g., rotator cuff tears)
    • findings
      • cacific deposits have low signal intensity on all sequences
  • Ultrasound
    • indications
      • may be useful to quantify the extent of the calcification
      • also utilized for guidance during needle decompression and injection
    • findings
      • deposits are hyperechoic
Treatment
  • Nonoperative
    • NSAIDs, physical therapy, stretching & strengthening, steroid injections
      • indications
        • first line of treatment for all phases 
      • techniques
        • steroid injections
          • commonly used but controversial
          • duration of relief is variable
      • outcomes
        • resolution of symptoms in 60-70% of patients after 6 months
        • increased probability of failure when:
          • bilateral or large calcifications
          • deposits underlying the anterior third of acromion
          • deposits extending medial to the acromion
    • extracorporeal shock-wave therapy
      • indications 
        • adjunct treatment 
        • most useful in refractory calcific tendonitis in the formative and resting phases
      • modalities
        • high- vs. low-energy therapy
      • outcomes
        • dose dependent outcomes
          • high-energy > low-energy in clinical outcome scores, and rate of calcific deposit resorption
          • high-energy > low-energy in procedural pain and local reaction (e.g. ecchymosis)
    • ultrasound-guided needle lavage vs. needle barbotage
      • indications
        • persistent symptomatic calcific tendonitis in the resorptive phase
      • outcomes
        • improved outcomes in patients with Type II/III calcific tendinitis vs Type I
  • Operative
    • surgical decompression of calcium deposit 
      • indications
        • progression of symptoms
        • refractory to nonoperative treatments
        • interference with activities of daily living
      • outcome
        • good results in short term outcome studies
        • longer return to work with subacromial decompression and/or rotator cuff repair
        • risk of shoulder stiffness with operative treatment
Techniques
  • Ultrasound-guided needle lavage
    • technique
      • two needles to maintain an outflow system for lavage  
        • small amount of saline+/-anesthetic injected around the calcification
        • aspiration of calcific material with other needle
  • Needle barbotage
    • technique
      • use needle to break up calcium deposit then follow with by corticosteroid injection
  • Surgical decompression of calcium deposit post  
    • approach
      • may be done arthroscopically or with mini-open approach
    • technique
      • +/- subacromial decompression
      • +/- rotator cuff repair
Complications
  • Recurrence
  • Persistent shoulder pain
  • Shoulder stiffness 
  • Iatrogenic injury to rotator cuff with operative treatment
 

Please rate topic.

Average 4.0 of 42 Ratings

Questions (3)
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
Virtual Curriculum Members Only
Click here to purchase

(OBQ08.187) A patient has shoulder pain and dysfunction. The radiograph is shown in Fig A. If this patient undergoes shoulder arthroscopy, which structure is most likely to be abnormal? Review Topic

QID: 573
FIGURES:
1

supraspinatus

90%

(1220/1358)

2

infraspinatus

1%

(16/1358)

3

glenohumeral articular cartilage

1%

(18/1358)

4

superior labrum

1%

(12/1358)

5

biceps tendon (long head)

6%

(86/1358)

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

PREFERRED RESPONSE 1
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
Virtual Curriculum Members Only
Click here to purchase
EVIDENCE & REFERENCES (5)
VIDEOS (1)
GROUPS (1)
Topic COMMENTS (6)
Private Note