Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Humeral Shaft Fractures
Posted: Apr 14 2020 #(C101428)
A

Humeral Shaft Fracture in 72F

HPI

72-year-old female, right-hand dominant, presents to clinic after a ground-level fall 1 week prior. She was initially treated with a Sarmiento brace which she was unable to tolerate. She admits to some chronic pain in the right shoulder prior to this injury, but denies any current distal weakness, numbness, or tingling.

PMH

Her PMH is significant for anxiety, GERD, and previous right shoulder surgery (~40 years prior) of unclear indication.

PE

BMI 29. Her skin is intact with no impending compromise but does have mild ecchymosis and tenderness about mid-brachium with obvious fracture motion. She is neurovascularly intact distally.

Poll
1 of 11
1. In addition to plain film radiographs, would you obtain additional imaging studies to guide management?
No - Current radiographs are sufficient
59%
1227/2061
Yes - Additional radiographs without Sarmiento brace in place
5%
117/2061
Yes - Additional radiographs with Sarmiento brace in place
21%
450/2061
Yes - CT scan (CT)
8%
167/2061
Yes - CT + Additional xrays
3%
67/2061
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
1%
33/2061
2. How would you manage this injury?
Nonoperative management
33%
689/2027
Operative management
64%
1313/2027
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
1%
25/2027
3. If you choose Nonoperative management as definitive treatment, what technique would you choose?
I would not choose Nonoperative management
42%
836/1950
Sling now - leave until healing
2%
47/1950
Coaptation splint now - leave until healing
4%
96/1950
Sarmiento (functional) brace now - leave until healing
20%
398/1950
Coaptation splint now - in 1-2 weeks transition to Sarmiento brace and leave until healing
27%
533/1950
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
2%
40/1950
4. If you choose Nonoperative management (either Sling, Coaptation, Sarmiento), how long would you leave it on for?
I would not choose Nonoperative management
39%
727/1859
Until pain free at fracture site
9%
176/1859
Until Radiographic Union
13%
256/1859
2-3 weeks then remove regardless
2%
51/1859
4-6 weeks then remove regardless
20%
388/1859
7-10 weeks then remove regardless
11%
223/1859
11-12 weeks then remove regardless
1%
36/1859
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
0%
2/1859
5. If you choose Nonoperative management, how often would you perform followups on the patient?
I would not choose Nonoperative management
38%
696/1795
Weekly until fracture union
4%
77/1795
Weekly for 3 weeks, then monthly until fracture union
28%
506/1795
Every other week until fracture union
5%
91/1795
Scheduled at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
22%
407/1795
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
1%
18/1795
6. If you choose Operative management, what surgical technique would you choose?
I would not choose Operative management
8%
155/1891
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) only (includes plate, screws, wires, minimally invasive plate)
50%
958/1891
Intramedullary nailing (IMN) only
28%
539/1891
ORIF + IMN
11%
214/1891
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
1%
23/1891
External Fixation
0%
2/1891
7. If you choose ORIF, what approach would you use?
I would not choose ORIF
15%
286/1802
Anterolateral
68%
1227/1802
Posterior
13%
241/1802
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
2%
48/1802
8. If you choose ORIF + IMN, what provisional fixation would you choose?
I would not choose Open reduction provisional fixation at fracture site+ IMN
38%
652/1690
Mini-frag plates
9%
158/1690
Cerclage cables
24%
422/1690
Lag screws
16%
275/1690
Combination of screws and cables
7%
129/1690
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
3%
54/1690
9. If you choose IMN, what approach would you use?
I would not choose IMN
34%
570/1633
Antegrade IMN
59%
971/1633
Retrograde IMN
3%
50/1633
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
2%
42/1633
10. If you choose ORIF only (includes plate, screws, wires, minimally invasive plate), what construct would you choose?
I would not choose ORIF at fracture site only (includes plate, screws, wires, minimally invasive plate)
18%
296/1597
Screw fixation only
1%
30/1597
Cerclage cable fixation only
1%
16/1597
Single long proximal humerus locking plate - open
47%
765/1597
Single large-frag straight plate - open
19%
317/1597
Dual plating - open
1%
28/1597
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
2%
39/1597
Minimal-invasive plating with a long proximal locking humeral plate via deltoid-split approach proximally
6%
106/1597
11. If you choose Operative management and obtained the construct below, what would your post-operative weight-bearing status be?
I would not choose IMN
24%
380/1532
Weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT)
23%
358/1532
Partial weight bearing (PWB) less than 5-10 lbs
29%
457/1532
Non-weight bearing (NWB)
19%
303/1532
Outside my area of expertise - best if I don't vote
2%
34/1532
PROCEDURE #1

Open Reduction with cerclage wire placement and Anterograde Intramedullary Nailing

icon
OUTCOMES
Post-procedure P1
Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options