• PURPOSE
    • To compare union rates and clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fixation with those of open reduction and fixation in patients with trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations.
  • METHODS
    • This retrospective study included consecutive patients with trans-scaphoid PLFDs who underwent arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fixation (group A) or open reduction and fixation (group O), and who were followed up for a minimum of 2 years between May 2005 and March 2013. We excluded initially missed patients. Each different surgeon who was on call had performed each experienced operation. These clinical outcomes were assessed: range of motion, grip strength, Mayo wrist score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. For radiologic outcomes, the scapholunate angle, radiolunate angle, and lunotriquetral distance were measured.
  • RESULTS
    • The total number of included patient was 20 (11 in group A and 9 in group O). Scaphoid union occurred in all patients except 1 individual (11 of 11 in group A, and 8 of 9 in group O). At the last follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was significantly greater in group A (125.0°) than in group O (105.6°) (P = .028). The mean grip strength was 81.1% that of the contralateral side in group A and 80.9% in group O (P = .594). The mean Mayo wrist score was 85.5 in group A and 79.4 in group O (P = .026), and the mean DASH score was 10.6 in group A and 20.8 in group O (P = .001); however, only the DASH score showed a minimum clinically important difference. The mean scapholunate angle, radiolunate angle, and lunotriquetral distance were similar between the 2 groups: 47.2°, 1.7°, and 2.0 mm in group A and 48.8°, 5.6°, and 2.1 mm in group O, respectively.
  • CONCLUSIONS
    • Although both arthroscopic and open techniques achieved stability of the injured wrists in patients with trans-scaphoid PLFDs, it is shown that the arthroscopic-assisted technique showed a clinically meaningful better DASH score and greater flexion-extension arc with other parameters being similar.
  • LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
    • Level III, retrospective comparative study.