Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 8924

In scope icon L 1 A
QID 8924 (Type "8924" in App Search)
A 12-year-old patient is scheduled to undergo in situ fixation of the right hip for chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). What would be an indication for prophylactic in situ fixation of the contralateral hip in the same admission?

Chronicity of initial slip

4%

114/2987

Height over 180cm

1%

40/2987

Age over 12 years old

4%

110/2987

Renal osteodystrophy

89%

2649/2987

Elite athlete

2%

55/2987

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

An indication for prophylactic in situ fixation of the contralateral hip for SCFE would include renal osteodystrophy.

The most common factors shown to increase the risk of bilateral SCFE include hypothyroidism, renal osteodystrophy, male and younger age (<10 years old).

Riad et al. retrospectively reviewed the records of 90 patients with SCFE seen between 1990 and 2002. Twenty patients (22%) had bilateral SCFE at presentation, and 70 patients (78%) were unilateral. Of these 70 patients, 16 (23%) later de- veloped a contralateral SCFE. All girls younger than 10 years and all boys younger than 12 years who presented with unilateral SCFE developed a contralateral slip. Whereas, No girl older than 13 years and no boy older than 14 years developed a contralateral slip.

Jensen et al. reported on a 20 year follow-up of 62 cases of patients with SCFE. At first presentation, 5/62 patients had bilateral SCFE. Further, 9/57 patients had slipping diagnosed in the contralateral hip during adolescence 1-3 years after the primary operation. At the follow-up examination 20 years after the primary operation, radiographs showed bilateral sequelae of slipping in 30 of 62 patients.

Wensaas et al. reviewed sixty-six patients (76 hips) treated for SCFE with a mean follow-up of 38 years (range 21–57 years. Results showed the clinical outcome was good in 35 patients (69%), as defined as when the patient had not undergone total hip replacement (THR), when the Harris hip score (HHS) was 85 points or above, or the patient had no pain. They also showed that corrective femoral osteotomy did not improve the outcome in hips with large slip angles and acute SCFE had poor outcomes.

Thawrani et al. reviewed the current practice for the treatment of SCFE. 277 members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America responded to the survey. They found that surgeons in academic practice, surgeons with ≤15 years in practice, and surgeons treating greater number of SCFEs are more likely to use SHD to acutely reduce the slip.

Incorrect Answers:
Answer 1: Chronicity of the initial slip is not an indication for prophylactic in situ fixation.
Answer 2: Height is not an indication for prophylactic in situ fixation.
Answer 3: Age < 10 would be considered a relative indication for contralateral pinning
Answer 5: Elite athlete is not an indication for prophylactic in situ fixation.

REFERENCES (4)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

0.0

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(0)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options