Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 215557

In scope icon L 3 E
QID 215557 (Type "215557" in App Search)
A 6-year-old patient presents with progressive scoliosis despite treatment with Mehta casting and TLSO bracing >13 hours per day. The decision is made to proceed with a growth-sparing construct. Which of the following statements is true regarding the treatment of early-onset scoliosis with a growing rod construct?

Traditional growing rods are associated with fewer surgical procedures compared to magnetically controlled rod constructs

5%

64/1215

Lower reoperation rates are seen following final fusion after growth-friendly constructs compared to primary spinal fusion

36%

442/1215

Complication and infection risk with growing rod constructs decease with younger age patients

5%

61/1215

Traditional growing rods are associated with increased curve correction and truncal height gain than VEPTR constructs

28%

337/1215

VEPTR constructs are associated with lower wound complications compared to traditional growing rod constructs

24%

295/1215

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

Traditional growing rod (TGR) constructs are associated with greater curve correction and truncal height gains than vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) constructs and are associated with significantly fewer complications.

Early-onset scoliosis is defined as scoliosis that presents before 10 years of age and can affect pulmonary development due to truncal shortening. However, early definitive fusion can limit the growth of the thoracic cavity and can lead to a crankshaft phenomenon. Growth-friendly constructs have been developed to allow for gradual expansion of the spine while correcting the spine deformity and improving pulmonary function until the patient has reached skeletal maturity for definitive fusion. TGR constructs have been associated with a greater curve correction, greater truncal height gain, and lower complication rates than VEPTR constructs in large multicenter studies. The presumed reason for this is the subcutaneous positioning of the VEPTR rods compared to the submuscular positioning of the TGR rods leading to implant prominence.

Bachabi et al. performed a multicenter retrospective study of patients with idiopathic early-onset scoliosis treated with TGR or VEPTR. They found a greater initial curve correction (50% vs 27%) and greater thoracic height gain (24% vs 12%) with TGR compared to VEPTR constructs. Additionally, there were significantly lower wound complications in patients treated with TGR constructs and patients with bilateral VEPTR constructs having the highest incidence of complications.

Fedorak et al. reviewed the management of early-onset scoliosis through an instructional course lecture. They discussed non-operative management with Mehta casting that has increased in popularity with several studies reporting a high rate of success with this technique. Operative management consists of growth-friendly constructs, for which the authors discussed magnetically controlled growing rods as a new option with decreased number of open lengthenings. They concluded that conversion of growth-friendly constructs to final fusion is associated with higher rates of complications and revision surgeries.

Incorrect answers
Answer 1: Magnetically controlled growing rods are a relatively new construct that requires fewer surgical lengthenings than traditional growing rod constructs.
Answer 2: Final fusion after a growing rod construct is associated with higher reoperation and complication rates than patients undergoing fusion alone.
Answer 3: There is an increased infection and wound complication risk in patients that undergoing growing rod procedures at a younger age and a longer duration of time between growing rod construct implantation and final fusion.
Answer 5: VEPTR constructs are associated with a significantly higher wound complication rate than traditional growing rod constructs due to the placement in a more subcutaneous position.

REFERENCES (2)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

2.6

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(8)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options