Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 214063

In scope icon L 4 A
QID 214063 (Type "214063" in App Search)
Figures A is the CT angiogram of a 22-year-old male (Patient A) who presents to the trauma bay after sustaining a low-velocity gunshot injury to the femur. Compared to Figure B, which is a different patient (Patient B) who also sustained a low velocity gunshot wound, the associated injury seen in Patient A places him at increased risk for which of the following?
  • A
  • B

Hip disarticulation

20%

666/3380

Infection

41%

1389/3380

Malunion

20%

673/3380

Hardware failure

4%

145/3380

Neuropraxia

14%

463/3380

  • A
  • B

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

This patient sustained a low-velocity gunshot wound to the femur with an associated vascular injury. The presence of a vascular injury has been shown to increase the risk of infection.

A low-velocity GSW is defined as a muzzle velocity <350 meters per second or <2,000 feet per second. Recent studies have demonstrated an increased risk of local infection when vascular injury and fracture occurred together. Therefore, these patients should receive antibiotics. Conversely, retained bullet fragments have not been shown to increase the risk of infection.

Berg et al. examined the epidemiology, incidence, and distribution of firearm-related extremity trauma and the relationship between injury pattern and local or systemic complications. They report that an isolated fracture increased the risk of compartment syndrome, whereas vascular injury alone increased the risk of compartment syndrome and deep venous thrombosis. Fracture and vascular injury together also increased the risk of wound infection. They conclude that gunshot-related fracture increases the risk of vascular and nerve injury and that vascular injury, with or without fracture, is the biggest predictor of local complications.

Nguyen et al. retrospectively reviewed the rates of infection in low-energy gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the extremity. They report that the overall infection rate was 15.7% (22 patients), and the deep infection rate was 3.6% (5 patients). They concluded that infections after low-energy extremity GSWs are infrequent, but soft tissue injuries without fracture treated with a single dose of intravenous antibiotics in the emergency department had a lower rate of infection.

In a separate study, Nguyen et al. retrospectively reviewed infection rates and other complications after intra-articular (IA) gunshot wounds. They report that 3.6% of patients developed deep infections, all had associated vascular injuries. They concluded that the incidence of infection after IA gunshot injuries is low with the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis and patients with vascular injury deserve special attention, as they are at higher risk of infection.

Watters et al. retrospectively reviewed the use of surgical débridement in the management of low-velocity gunshot injuries (GSIs) resulting in pelvis fractures. They found a deep infection related to their pelvis GSIs occurred in 7% and 6% among patients who underwent surgical débridement and those who did not, respectively. They concluded that there was no increased incidence of infection in the absence of aggressive surgical débridement of pelvis GSI wounds. The study also demonstrated that retained bullets and bullet fragments did not increase the risk of infection, even after penetrating the GI tract organs.

Figure A is a CT angiogram demonstrating a right femur fracture with a vascular injury. Figure B is a CT angiogram demonstrating a right femur fracture without a vascular injury.

Incorrect Answers:
Answer 1: Due to the location of the injury, Patient A may be at increased risk for amputation, but is not at increased risk for hip disarticulation
Answer 3: The presence of a vascular injury has not been shown to increase the risk of malunion
Answer 4: The presence of vascular injury has not been shown to increase the risk of hardware failure
Answer 5: Nerve damage, not vascular injury, would increase the risk of neuropraxia

REFERENCES (4)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

1.8

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(13)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options