Select a Community
Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?
You are done for today with this topic.
Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?
It may be performed in a minimally invasive manner
0%
13/2627
It involves minimal soft tissue stripping
11%
279/2627
It leads to higher union rates
5%
123/2627
It allows the surgeon to address all sites of injury through one approach
65%
1712/2627
Answers 1 and 2
18%
472/2627
Select Answer to see Preferred Response
This patient has sustained a right hip fracture-dislocation with fractures of the femoral head and posterior wall. The TFO allows the surgeon to address all sites of injury through a single approach. Femoral head fracture-dislocations are a result of high-energy trauma. Treatment ranges from closed reduction and conservative management to total hip arthroplasty. Intermediate options include open reduction and internal fixation or excision of fracture fragments. Complications of this injury include post-traumatic hip arthritis, avascular necrosis, and heterotopic ossification. The injury is further complicated when a fracture of the acetabulum is concomitantly present. There has been no consensus treatment on this injury constellation as it presents quite rarely. The TFO is one approach that allows the surgeon to treat and stabilize both injuries concurrently. It should be noted that a surgical hip dislocation is performed in conjunction with the TFO to allow access to the femoral head. Solberg et al. performed a retrospective study of patients sustaining Pipkin IV fracture/dislocations with a TFO. They had 12 patients over a 6 month period. They found that all patients healed radiologically and one patient developed osteonecrosis. 10 out of 12 patients had good to excellent outcomes. They concluded that using a surgical protocol with TFO rendered clinical results comparable to previously reported outcomes in a series of isolated femoral head fractures. Giannoudis et al. performed a systematic review to investigate data regarding femoral head fractures, particularly focusing on their management, complications and clinical results. They reported that fracture-dislocations were managed with emergent closed reduction, followed by definite treatment, aiming at an anatomic restoration of both fracture and joint incongruity. They concluded that neither the TFO nor an anterior approach seems to endanger femoral head blood supply compared to the posterior one, with the TFO possibly providing better long-term functional results and lower incidence of major complication rates. Henle et al. reported on the result of 12 patients of femoral head fractures with associated posterior wall fractures treated with a TFO. They found good to excellent results in 10 patients. The two patients with poor outcome developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head and underwent total hip arthroplasty. Heterotopic ossification was seen in five patients. They concluded that the TFO may lead to favorable outcomes in this injury constellation. Figure A is an AP radiograph of the right hip demonstrating a femoral head fracture-dislocation. Figure B is an axial CT image demonstrating a posterior wall fracture. Figure C is an axial CT image demonstrating a femoral head fragment within the acetabulum. Illustration A is the Pipkin classification of femoral head fractures: Type I is below the fovea, Type II is above the fovea, Type III is associated with a femoral neck fracture, and Type IV is associated with an acetabular fracture. Incorrect Answers: Answers 1, 2, & 5: The TFO is not a minimally invasive approach. Answer 3: There is no evidence that shows that this approach leads to higher union rates of this injury
3.0
(7)
Please Login to add comment